[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200722121458.8478-2-horia.geanta@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:14:52 +0300
From: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@....com>,
Dan Douglass <dan.douglass@....com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] crypto: caam - remove deadcode on 32-bit platforms
From: Franck LENORMAND <franck.lenormand@....com>
When building on a platform with a 32bit DMA address, taking the
upper 32 bits makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: Franck LENORMAND <franck.lenormand@....com>
Signed-off-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
---
drivers/crypto/caam/regs.h | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/caam/regs.h b/drivers/crypto/caam/regs.h
index 0f810bc13b2b..af61f3a2c0d4 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/caam/regs.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/caam/regs.h
@@ -173,9 +173,14 @@ static inline u64 rd_reg64(void __iomem *reg)
static inline u64 cpu_to_caam_dma64(dma_addr_t value)
{
- if (caam_imx)
- return (((u64)cpu_to_caam32(lower_32_bits(value)) << 32) |
- (u64)cpu_to_caam32(upper_32_bits(value)));
+ if (caam_imx) {
+ u64 ret_val = (u64)cpu_to_caam32(lower_32_bits(value)) << 32;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT))
+ ret_val |= (u64)cpu_to_caam32(upper_32_bits(value));
+
+ return ret_val;
+ }
return cpu_to_caam64(value);
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists