lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200722144650.GA19628@pc636>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:46:50 +0200
From:   Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        x86@...nel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        lpf.vector@...il.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:LINE! (2)

> > > syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> > > 
> > > HEAD commit:    ab8be66e Add linux-next specific files for 20200720
> > > git tree:       linux-next
> > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=161a0cc8900000
> > > kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c4bf77d63d0cf88c
> > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5f326d255ca648131f87
> > > compiler:       gcc (GCC) 10.1.0-syz 20200507
> > > syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=151192bb100000
> > > C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=12d7a873100000
> > > 
> > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+5f326d255ca648131f87@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > 
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:3089!
> > > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> > > CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc6-next-20200720-syzkaller #0
> > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> > > Workqueue: events pcpu_balance_workfn
> > > RIP: 0010:free_vm_area mm/vmalloc.c:3089 [inline]
> > > RIP: 0010:free_vm_area mm/vmalloc.c:3085 [inline]
> > > RIP: 0010:pcpu_free_vm_areas+0x96/0xc0 mm/vmalloc.c:3432
> > > Code: 75 48 48 8b 2b 48 8d 7d 08 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 30 00 75 2c 48 8b 7d 08 e8 c4 c8 ff ff 48 39 c5 74 a5 e8 ea c3 c9 ff <0f> 0b e8 e3 c3 c9 ff 4c 89 ff 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f e9 71
> > > RSP: 0018:ffffc90000d2fba8 EFLAGS: 00010293
> > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880a801be00 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > RDX: ffff8880a95fa300 RSI: ffffffff81aa7c76 RDI: 0000000000000001
> > > RBP: ffff8880a2b38180 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff89cfecc3
> > > R10: fffffbfff139fd98 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> > > R13: 0000000000000001 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff8880a801be00
> > > FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880ae600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > CR2: 00000000004c8e48 CR3: 00000000a4c08000 CR4: 00000000001506f0
> > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  pcpu_destroy_chunk mm/percpu-vm.c:366 [inline]
> > >  __pcpu_balance_workfn mm/percpu.c:1982 [inline]
> > >  pcpu_balance_workfn+0x8b3/0x1310 mm/percpu.c:2069
> > >  process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269
> > >  worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415
> > >  kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
> > >  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294
> > > Modules linked in:
> > > ---[ end trace 6a2e56ec52e1f480 ]---
> > > RIP: 0010:free_vm_area mm/vmalloc.c:3089 [inline]
> > > RIP: 0010:free_vm_area mm/vmalloc.c:3085 [inline]
> > > RIP: 0010:pcpu_free_vm_areas+0x96/0xc0 mm/vmalloc.c:3432
> > > Code: 75 48 48 8b 2b 48 8d 7d 08 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 30 00 75 2c 48 8b 7d 08 e8 c4 c8 ff ff 48 39 c5 74 a5 e8 ea c3 c9 ff <0f> 0b e8 e3 c3 c9 ff 4c 89 ff 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f e9 71
> > > RSP: 0018:ffffc90000d2fba8 EFLAGS: 00010293
> > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8880a801be00 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > RDX: ffff8880a95fa300 RSI: ffffffff81aa7c76 RDI: 0000000000000001
> > > RBP: ffff8880a2b38180 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff89cfecc3
> > > R10: fffffbfff139fd98 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> > > R13: 0000000000000001 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff8880a801be00
> > > FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880ae600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > CR2: 00000000004c8e48 CR3: 00000000a4c08000 CR4: 00000000001506f0
> > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > > 
> > That is because of below revert:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > commit bdbfb1d52d5e576c1d275fd8ab59b677011229e8
> > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > Date:   Sun Jun 7 21:12:51 2020 +0200
> > 
> >     Revert "mm/vmalloc: modify struct vmap_area to reduce its size"
> >     
> >     This reverts commit 688fcbfc06e4fdfbb7e1d5a942a1460fe6379d2d.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> >     
> >     Conflicts:
> >             mm/vmalloc.c
> > <snip>
> > 
> > I can check further, but it can be it was not correctly reverted,
> > because everything should work just fine even with the revert,
> > though i i do not understand a reason of reverting.
> 
> Vlad, how sure are you about this? We also start to trigger this now on
> linux-next, but the reverting patch surely looks like doggy without any useful
> information in the commit description.
>
Hello, Andrew, Qian.

I am not aware of reason of the revert, though i tried to get through Ingo.
I can send out a patch that fixes the revert. Another option to drop the
revert, but it is up to Andrew and Ingo.

Andrew, could you please comment on?

Thank you in advance!

--
Vlad Rezki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ