[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGteY6Mwy+jQaj6Vo0e4bMW6P1q19PMmdOqQrxr-RQxkQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 07:54:40 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/qcom: Use domain rather than dev as tlb cookie
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:10 AM Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:45:17AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 21:21, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > The device may be torn down, but the domain should still be valid. Lets
> > > use that as the tlb flush ops cookie.
> > >
> > > Fixes a problem reported in [1]
> >
> > This proposed fix patch applied on top of linux mainline master
> > and boot test PASS on db410c.
> >
> > The reported problem got fixed.
>
> Is this needed for v5.8/stable? A fixes tag would be great too.
looks like, yes:
Fixes: 09b5dfff9ad6 ("iommu/qcom: Use accessor functions for iommu
private data")
BR,
-R
>
> Regards,
>
> Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists