lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:05:06 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc:     Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:02 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 04:42 PM CEST, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > Can I submit a patch to net tree that rewrites udp[46]_lib_lookup2() to
> > use only 'result' ?
>
> Feel free. That should make the conflict resolution even easier later
> on.

Thanks for the detailed analysis, Jakub.

Would it be easier to fix this wholly in bpf-next, by introducing
reuseport_result there?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ