linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: revert "spi-nor: intel: provide a range for poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:37:21 +0200
From:   Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
To:     Luis Alberto Herrera <luisalberto@...gle.com>,
        tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com
Cc:     Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: revert "spi-nor: intel: provide a range for
 poll_timout"

Hello Luis,

thank you for the patch!

On 11/06/2020 00:46, Luis Alberto Herrera wrote:
> This change reverts aba3a882a178: "mtd: spi-nor: intel: provide a range
> for poll_timout". That change introduces a performance regression when
> reading sequentially from flash. Logging calls to intel_spi_read without
> this change we get:
> 
> Start MTD read
> [   20.045527] intel_spi_read(from=1800000, len=400000)
> [   20.045527] intel_spi_read(from=1800000, len=400000)
> [  282.199274] intel_spi_read(from=1c00000, len=400000)
> [  282.199274] intel_spi_read(from=1c00000, len=400000)
> [  544.351528] intel_spi_read(from=2000000, len=400000)
> [  544.351528] intel_spi_read(from=2000000, len=400000)
> End MTD read
> 
> With this change:
> 
> Start MTD read
> [   21.942922] intel_spi_read(from=1c00000, len=400000)
> [   21.942922] intel_spi_read(from=1c00000, len=400000)
> [   23.784058] intel_spi_read(from=2000000, len=400000)
> [   23.784058] intel_spi_read(from=2000000, len=400000)
> [   25.625006] intel_spi_read(from=2400000, len=400000)
> [   25.625006] intel_spi_read(from=2400000, len=400000)
> End MTD read

I've performed my testing as well and got the following results:

Vanilla Linux 4.9 (i.e. before the introduction of the offending
patch):

dd if=/dev/flash/by-name/XXX of=/dev/null bs=4k              
1280+0 records in
1280+0 records out
5242880 bytes (5.2 MB, 5.0 MiB) copied, 3.91981 s, 1.3 MB/s

Vanilla 4.19 (i.e. with offending patch):

dd if=/dev/flash/by-name/XXX of=/dev/null bs=4k
1280+0 records in
1280+0 records out
5242880 bytes (5.2 MB, 5.0 MiB) copied, 6.70891 s, 781 kB/s

4.19 + revert:

dd if=/dev/flash/by-name/XXX of=/dev/null bs=4k
1280+0 records in
1280+0 records out
5242880 bytes (5.2 MB, 5.0 MiB) copied, 3.90503 s, 1.3 MB/s

Therefore it looks good from my PoV:

Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>

> Signed-off-by: Luis Alberto Herrera <luisalberto@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c
> index 61d2a0ad2131..2b89361a0d3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_hw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi)
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->base + HSFSTS_CTL, val,
> -				  !(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40,
> +				  !(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0,
>  				  INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000);
>  }
>  
> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_sw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi)
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->sregs + SSFSTS_CTL, val,
> -				  !(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40,
> +				  !(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0,
>  				  INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000);
>  }
>  
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.