lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159553326368.21069.3167204000119437062@build.alporthouse.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:41:03 +0100
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/5] sched: Fix ttwu() race

Quoting Peter Zijlstra (2020-07-23 19:28:41)
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:57:56AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps more damning is that I can replace WF_ON_CPU with p->on_cpu to
> > suppress the warning:
> 
> *argh*, I'm starting to go mad...
> 
> Chris, could you please try the below patch?

 ttwu-IPI-self: 1==1, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=1;1
 ttwu-IPI-self: 1==1, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=1;1
 ttwu-IPI-self: 0==0, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=0;0
 ttwu-IPI-self: 3==3, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=3;3
 ttwu-IPI-self: 2==2, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=2;2
 ttwu-IPI-self: 1==1, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=1;1
 ttwu-IPI-self: 2==2, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=2;2
 ttwu-IPI-self: 2==2, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=2;2
 ttwu-IPI-self: 2==2, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=2;2

> Can you also confirm that if you do:
> 
> $ echo NO_TTWU_QUEUE_ON_CPU > /debug/sched_features

With,

 sched_feat_disable(10):TTWU_QUEUE_ON_CPU

the pr_alert is still being hit

 ttwu-IPI-self: 3==3, p->on_cpu=0;0, task_cpu(p)=3;3

At which point, it darns on me. Mea culpa, stray bits being passed into
default_wake_function.

I am very sorry for the wild goose chase.
-Chris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ