[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6d7d1cd-0e4c-86c7-b1e6-1588c4b9e6ea@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:53:25 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] i2c: designware: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword
On 7/23/20 15:07, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> I see. Still, people can ack parts of a patch they are responsible for.
> I ack this way every now and then for cleanup patches, too.
>
OK, I've got it. I'll take this into account for the next time.
> That being said. All v2 and newer patches squashed into one and applied
> to for-next.
>
Awesome. :)
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists