lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:23:01 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, bp@...en8.de,
        james.morse@....com, lenb@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        dan.carpenter@...cle.com, zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
        jroedel@...e.de, linuxarm@...wei.com, yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
        jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, tanxiaofei@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor
 specific HW errors

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:42:43AM +0100, Shiju Jose wrote:
> CPER records describing a firmware-first error are identified by GUID.
> The ghes driver currently logs, but ignores any unknown CPER records.
> This prevents describing errors that can't be represented by a standard
> entry, that would otherwise allow a driver to recover from an error.
> The UEFI spec calls these 'Non-standard Section Body' (N.2.3 of
> version 2.8).
> 
> patch set
> 1. add a notifier chain for these non-standard/vendor-records
>    in the ghes driver.
> 
> 2. add a driver to handle HiSilicon HIP PCIe controller's errors.
>    
> Changes:
> 
> V13:
> 1. Following changes in the HIP PCIe error handling driver.
> 1.1 Add Bjorn's acked-by.
> 1.2. Address the comments and macros order Bjorn mentioned.
>      Fix the words in the commit.

This series is ill-formed:

  - Jul 22  5:39 Shiju Jose      [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to not
  - Jul 22  5:39 Shiju Jose      └─>[PATCH v13 1/2] ACPI / APEI: Add a notifier
  - Jul 22  5:42 Shiju Jose      [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to not
  - Jul 22  5:42 Shiju Jose      └─>[PATCH v13 2/2] PCI: hip: Add handling of Hi

Patches 1/2 and 2/2 never appear in the same thread.  Both should be
replies to 0/2.  And should be only *one* v13 0/2, not two :)

Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ