[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200723044734.GU12965@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:17:34 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
broonie@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] ALSA: compress: add new ioctl for setting
codec parameters
On 22-07-20, 10:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> > > > * and the stream properties
> > > > + * @set_codec_params: Sets the compressed stream codec
> > > > parameters, Optional
> > > > + * This can be called in during gapless next track codec change
> > > > only to set
> > > > + * codec params
> > >
> > > Would it be clearer if this was called set_next_codec_params()? or
> > > set_next_track_codec_params()?
> > >
> > > Having set_params() and set_codec_params() is a bit confusing since
> > > the semantic difference is not captured in the callback name.
> >
> > set_next_track_codec_params seems more sensible as its next track params.
> > Will change this in next version!
>
> maybe set_params() and set_next_track_params() are enough, not sure if the
> codec reference helps?
params typically refers to whole set of compress parameters which
includes buffer information and codec parameters, so codec reference
would help.
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists