[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159546542444.3847286.3076597427214316886@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:50:24 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Akash Asthana <akashast@...eaurora.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, msavaliy@...eaurora.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom-geni-se: Don't use relaxed writes when writing commands
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-07-22 15:01:20)
> Writing the command is the final step in kicking off a transfer.
> Let's use writel() to ensure that any other memory accesses are done
> before the command kicks off. It's expected that this is mostly
> relevant if we're in DMA mode but since it doesn't appear to regress
> performance in a measurable way [1] even in PIO mode and it's easier
> to reason about then let's just always use it.
>
> NOTE: this patch came about due to code inspection. No actual
> problems were observed that this patch fixes.
>
> [1] Tested by timing "flashrom -p ec" on a Chromebook which stresses
> GENI SPI a lot.
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists