[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62c8ce6c-fe98-f371-99b6-cfdb96d1c2fd@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:46:30 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com, david@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/hugetl.c: warn out if expected count of huge
pages adjustment is not achieved
On 07/23/2020 08:52 AM, Baoquan He wrote:
> A customer complained that no message is logged wh en the number of
> persistent huge pages is not changed to the exact value written to
> the sysfs or proc nr_hugepages file.
>
> In the current code, a best effort is made to satisfy requests made
> via the nr_hugepages file. However, requests may be only partially
> satisfied.
>
> Log a message if the code was unsuccessful in fully satisfying a
> request. This includes both increasing and decreasing the number
> of persistent huge pages.
But is kernel expected to warn for all such situations where the user
requested resources could not be allocated completely ? Otherwise, it
does not make sense to add an warning for just one such situation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists