lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62c8ce6c-fe98-f371-99b6-cfdb96d1c2fd@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:46:30 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com, david@...hat.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/hugetl.c: warn out if expected count of huge
 pages adjustment is not achieved



On 07/23/2020 08:52 AM, Baoquan He wrote:
> A customer complained that no message is logged wh	en the number of
> persistent huge pages is not changed to the exact value written to
> the sysfs or proc nr_hugepages file.
> 
> In the current code, a best effort is made to satisfy requests made
> via the nr_hugepages file.  However, requests may be only partially
> satisfied.
> 
> Log a message if the code was unsuccessful in fully satisfying a
> request. This includes both increasing and decreasing the number
> of persistent huge pages.

But is kernel expected to warn for all such situations where the user
requested resources could not be allocated completely ? Otherwise, it
does not make sense to add an warning for just one such situation.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ