[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200723080444.GE3703480@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:04:44 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
Cc: kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, fkostenzer@...e.at,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit: Convert test_sort to KUnit test
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:08:07PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote:
> This adds the conversion of the test_sort.c to KUnit test.
>
> Please apply this commit first (linux-kselftest/kunit-fixes):
> 3f37d14b8a3152441f36b6bc74000996679f0998 kunit: kunit_config: Fix parsing of CONFIG options with space
...
> lib/{test_sort.c => sort_kunit.c} | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
Is it established practice to put kunit as a suffix?
For me much better to do
ls .../test* # and note shell completions
then drop shell completions and always do something like
ls .../*_kunit.[cSsh]
Consider this, please.
P.S. Same question to KUnit folks.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists