linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87v9iek0g3.fsf@soft-dev15.microsemi.net>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:09:00 +0200
From:   Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        "Michael Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC


Arnd Bergmann writes:

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:33 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch series adds support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC, the CPU
>> system of a advanced, TSN capable gigabit switch. The CPU is an armv8
>> x 2 CPU core (A53).
>>
>> Although this is an ARM core, it shares some peripherals with the
>> Microsemi Ocelot MIPS SoC.
>
> I've picked up this version of the series into an arm/newsoc branch in
> the soc tree,
> except for the pinctrl patch that Linus Walleij already merged.
>

Great! Thanks a lot for following up!

> I see you still have a few pending patches for other subsystems (spi, mmc)
> and I'm not sure what the status is for those and am dropping them for the
> moment.
>

Yes, I had a question out for the SPI maintainer but did not get any
feedback, so I was thinking just doing my own assumptions and refreshing
the series - probably tomorrow.

I also just bumped the MMC maintainer (Adrian) yesterday, as he did send
a me an 'Acked-by', but it hasn't been merged it seems.

> Once the bindings are accepted by the respective subsystem maintainers,
> please send any remaining DT patches as a follow-up to what I've already
> merged.
>

I'll try to work out the puzzle, might need to reach out directly to to
determine whats missing.

Later,

---Lars

>       Arnd

-- 
Lars Povlsen,
Microchip