[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200723110523.GA4759@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:05:23 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
Cc: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: dwc3: Add support for VBUS power control
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 09:56:14AM +0200, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:25:12PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> > +void dwc3_set_vbus(struct dwc3 *dwc, bool enable)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (enable != dwc->vbus_reg_enabled) {
> > + if (enable)
> > + ret = regulator_enable(dwc->vbus_reg);
> > + else
> > + ret = regulator_disable(dwc->vbus_reg);
> dwc->vbus_reg is set to NULL when the regulator is not present. These
> regulator_* functions expect a non-NULL pointer so a NULL check is
> required before calling them.
Does the device actually support running without power so that's a thing
that can happen? _get_optional() should only ever be used for supplies
that may be physically absent.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists