[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200723125732.GA9795@kozik-lap>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:57:32 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: clk: Fix assignment from incompatible pointer type
for ioreadX()
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:49:46PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof!
>
> On 7/23/20 10:20 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Maybe because it depends on commit 58c4d8659186 ("sh: clkfwk: remove
> > r8/r16/r32") which landed later? Anyway it should go through your tree,
> > I think.
> > ---
> > drivers/sh/clk/cpg.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/sh/clk/cpg.c b/drivers/sh/clk/cpg.c
> > index a5cacfe24a42..fd72d9088bdc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/sh/clk/cpg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/sh/clk/cpg.c
> > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static int sh_clk_mstp_enable(struct clk *clk)
> > {
> > sh_clk_write(sh_clk_read(clk) & ~(1 << clk->enable_bit), clk);
> > if (clk->status_reg) {
> > - unsigned int (*read)(void __iomem *addr);
> > + unsigned int (*read)(const void __iomem *addr);
> > int i;
> > void __iomem *mapped_status = (phys_addr_t)clk->status_reg -
> > (phys_addr_t)clk->enable_reg + clk->mapped_reg;
>
> Is that a reverted patch, by any chance? The patch does not apply for me and looking at
> the sources, the qualifier is already "const" [1].
The patch is for Andrew Morton's tree which contain two commits:
1. sh: clkfwk: remove r8/r16/r32
2. iomap: constify ioreadX() iomem argument (as in generic implementation)
This patch here was actually part of #2 because of being based on
linux-next. However it disappeared when applying to Andrew's tree
because patch #1 came later.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists