[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200723143727.GW32107@kitsune.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:37:27 +0200
From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] powerpc/64s: implement queued spinlocks and
rwlocks
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 02:35:38PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> These have shown significantly improved performance and fairness when
> spinlock contention is moderate to high on very large systems.
>
> [ Numbers hopefully forthcoming after more testing, but initial
> results look good ]
>
> Thanks to the fast path, single threaded performance is not noticably
> hurt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 13 ++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 5 +++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 5 +++++
> arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile | 3 +++
> include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 2 ++
> 7 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 24ac85c868db..17663ea57697 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ config PPC
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
> select ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP
> select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF if PPC64
> + select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS if PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> + select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS if PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> select ARCH_WEAK_RELEASE_ACQUIRE
> select BINFMT_ELF
> @@ -492,6 +494,17 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU
>
> Say N if you are unsure.
>
> +config PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> + bool "Queued spinlocks"
> + depends on SMP
> + default "y" if PPC_BOOK3S_64
> + help
> + Say Y here to use to use queued spinlocks which are more complex
> + but give better salability and fairness on large SMP and NUMA
^ +c?
Thanks
Michal
> + systems.
> +
> + If unsure, say "Y" if you have lots of cores, otherwise "N".
> +
> config ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
> def_bool y
> depends on HOTPLUG_CPU
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild
> index dadbcf3a0b1e..1dd8b6adff5e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild
> @@ -6,5 +6,7 @@ generated-y += syscall_table_spu.h
> generic-y += export.h
> generic-y += local64.h
> generic-y += mcs_spinlock.h
> +generic-y += qrwlock.h
> +generic-y += qspinlock.h
> generic-y += vtime.h
> generic-y += early_ioremap.h
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c49e33e24edd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_QSPINLOCK_H
> +#define _ASM_POWERPC_QSPINLOCK_H
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>
> +
> +#define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS (1 << 9) /* not tuned */
> +
> +#define smp_mb__after_spinlock() smp_mb()
> +
> +static __always_inline int queued_spin_is_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
> +{
> + /*
> + * This barrier was added to simple spinlocks by commit 51d7d5205d338,
> + * but it should now be possible to remove it, asm arm64 has done with
> + * commit c6f5d02b6a0f.
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> + return atomic_read(&lock->val);
> +}
> +#define queued_spin_is_locked queued_spin_is_locked
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_QSPINLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 21357fe05fe0..434615f1d761 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -3,7 +3,12 @@
> #define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> +#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> +#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
> +#else
> #include <asm/simple_spinlock.h>
> +#endif
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> #endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> index 3906f52dae65..c5d742f18021 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,11 @@
> # error "please don't include this file directly"
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> +#include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h>
> +#else
> #include <asm/simple_spinlock_types.h>
> +#endif
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
> index 5e994cda8e40..d66a645503eb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
> @@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) += copyuser_power7.o copypage_power7.o \
> obj64-y += copypage_64.o copyuser_64.o mem_64.o hweight_64.o \
> memcpy_64.o memcpy_mcsafe_64.o
>
> +ifndef CONFIG_PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> obj64-$(CONFIG_SMP) += locks.o
> +endif
> +
> obj64-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC) += vmx-helper.o
> obj64-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_emulate_step.o \
> test_emulate_step_exec_instr.o
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> index fde943d180e0..fb0a814d4395 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>
> #include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>
>
> +#ifndef queued_spin_is_locked
> /**
> * queued_spin_is_locked - is the spinlock locked?
> * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ static __always_inline int queued_spin_is_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
> */
> return atomic_read(&lock->val);
> }
> +#endif
>
> /**
> * queued_spin_value_unlocked - is the spinlock structure unlocked?
> --
> 2.23.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists