linux-kernel - Re: Regression on todays tip/master (commit 16f70beccf43)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:46:04 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression on todays tip/master (commit 16f70beccf43)

Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> writes:
> while testing the SEV-ES patches on todays tip/master I triggered the BUG
> below:
>
> [  137.629660] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  137.630769] kernel BUG at kernel/signal.c:1917!
> [  137.631796] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [  137.632822] CPU: 3 PID: 28596 Comm: test_syscall_vd Not tainted 5.8.0-rc6-tip+ #3
> [  137.634495] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> [  137.636236] RIP: 0010:do_notify_parent+0x25c/0x290
> The guest had 4 VCPUs and ran 4 instances of the in-kernel x86-selftests
> in a loop, together with 'perf top -e cycles:k'. As you can see in the
> time-stamps, the issue triggered pretty quickly.
>
> Please let me know if you need more information or testing from my side.

Any chance to bisect this?

Thanks,

        tglx