| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:33:22 +0000
From: <Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com>
To: <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, <balbi@...nel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] usb: gadget: udc: atmel: use
of_find_matching_node_and_match
On 7/23/20 7:28 PM, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote:
>
>
> On 22.07.2020 17:43, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22.07.2020 16:44, cristian.birsan@...rochip.com wrote:
>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
>>>
>>> Instead of trying to match every possible compatible use
>>> of_find_matching_node_and_match() and pass the compatible array.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>>> index c5128c229c52..ee2b550aa400 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
>>> @@ -2112,6 +2112,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id atmel_udc_dt_ids[] = {
>>>
>>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_udc_dt_ids);
>>>
>>> +static const struct of_device_id atmel_pmc_dt_ids[] = {
>>> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc" },
>>> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-pmc" },
>>> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc" },
>>> + { /* sentinel */ }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static struct usba_ep * atmel_udc_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> struct usba_udc *udc)
>>> {
>>> @@ -2128,13 +2135,17 @@ static struct usba_ep * atmel_udc_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>
>>> udc_config = match->data;
>>> udc->errata = udc_config->errata;
>>> - udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc");
>>> - if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>>> - udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9rl-pmc");
>>> - if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>>> - udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc");
>>> - if (udc->errata && IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>>> - return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
>>> + if (udc->errata) {
>>> + pp = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, atmel_pmc_dt_ids,
>>> + NULL);
>>> + if (!pp)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> +
>>> + udc->pmc = syscon_node_to_regmap(pp);
>>> + of_node_put(pp);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
>>> + return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
>>> + }
>>
>> This seems a bit not similar. I may had been wrong at the moment I wrote
>> this patch. Probably the best would be:
>>
>> + udc->pmc = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> + pp = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, atmel_pmc_dt_ids,
>> + NULL);
>> + if (pp) {
>> + udc->pmc = syscon_node_to_regmap(pp);
>> + of_node_put(pp);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((!pp || IS_ERR(udc->pmc)) && udc->errata)
>> + return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
>
> Actually, the initial patch should be good and simpler than what I proposed
> in previous email. Please ignore it.
>
> Sorry for the noise!
I will rebase again the patchset on top of testing/next and send a V4 with your original version.
Regards,
Cristian Birsan
>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Claudiu Beznea
>>
>>>
>>> udc->num_ep = 0;
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists