[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200724193913.GD1227@ninjato>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:39:13 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: i2c: add generic properties for GPIO
bus recovery
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > +- pinctrl
> > + add extra pinctrl to configure SCL/SDA pins to GPIO function for bus
> > + recovery, call it "gpio" or "recovery" state
>
> I think we should stick with "gpio" only. That is what at91 and imx have
> in their bindings. pxa uses "recovery" as a pinctrl state name but I
> can't find any further use or documentation of that. PXA is not fully
> converted to the best of my knowledge, so maybe it is no problem for PXA
> to switch to "gpio", too? We should ask Russell King (cced).
>
> Russell, do you object naming the pinctrl state for bus recovery in
> the pxa i2c driver from "recovery" to "gpio"?
No response, so far. I suggest now to support the "recovery" naming but
mark it as deprecated. Opinions?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists