linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix build on architectures with special bpf_user_pt_regs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200724200503.3629591-1-songliubraving@fb.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:05:02 -0700
From:   Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        <brouer@...hat.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix build on architectures with special bpf_user_pt_regs_t

Architectures like s390, powerpc, arm64, riscv have speical definition of
bpf_user_pt_regs_t. So we need to cast the pointer before passing it to
bpf_get_stack(). This is similar to bpf_get_stack_tp().

Fixes: 03d42fd2d83f ("bpf: Separate bpf_get_[stack|stackid] for perf events BPF")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 5beb2f8c23da1..4fd830a62be2d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_task_stack_proto = {
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
 	   void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags)
 {
+	struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)(ctx->regs);
 	struct perf_event *event = ctx->event;
 	struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
 	bool kernel, user;
@@ -685,7 +686,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
 	__u64 nr_kernel;
 
 	if (!(event->attr.sample_type & __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY))
-		return __bpf_get_stack(ctx->regs, NULL, NULL, buf, size, flags);
+		return __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, NULL, buf, size, flags);
 
 	if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
 			       BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID)))
@@ -705,8 +706,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
 		__u64 nr = trace->nr;
 
 		trace->nr = nr_kernel;
-		err = __bpf_get_stack(ctx->regs, NULL, trace, buf,
-				      size, flags);
+		err = __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, trace, buf, size, flags);
 
 		/* restore nr */
 		trace->nr = nr;
@@ -718,8 +718,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
 			goto clear;
 
 		flags = (flags & ~BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK) | skip;
-		err = __bpf_get_stack(ctx->regs, NULL, trace, buf,
-				      size, flags);
+		err = __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, trace, buf, size, flags);
 	}
 	return err;
 
-- 
2.24.1