lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:11:57 -0700
From:   Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To:     Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>,
        'Rajkumar Manoharan' <rmanohar@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
        johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, linux-wireless-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread



On 7/23/2020 11:25 AM, Rakesh Pillai wrote:
> Hi Rajkumar,
> In linux, the IRQs are directed to the first core which is booted.
> I see that all the IRQs are getting routed to CORE0 even if its heavily
> loaded.
> 

You should be able to configure the initial IRQ setup so that they don't
all go on CPU 0 when you create the IRQ. That obviously doesn't help the
case of wanting scheduler to dynamically move the processing around to
other CPUs though.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ