[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200724150611.40b17827@xhacker.debian>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:06:11 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] arm64: implement KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:24:55 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jisheng,
Hi,
>
> Would you be still working on this series?
I will rebase the implementation on the latest code, then try to address
your comments and Mark's comments. I will send out patches in this weekend.
>
> If you are still want to put a probe on func+4, it is OK if you can
> completely emulate the 1st instruction. (lr save on the stack and
> change the regs->sp)
Will check which is the better solution.
Thank you very much
Powered by blists - more mailing lists