[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a946e992-ff36-ca45-1811-7c6b0aaa161f@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:38:05 +0200
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: freude@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/15] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search
for queue devices
On 2020-07-20 17:03, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> This patch refactor's the vfio_ap device driver to use the AP bus's
> ap_get_qdev() function to retrieve the vfio_ap_queue struct containing
> information about a queue that is bound to the vfio_ap device driver.
> The bus's ap_get_qdev() function retrieves the queue device from a
> hashtable keyed by APQN. This is much more efficient than looping over
> the list of devices attached to the AP bus by several orders of
> magnitude.
The patch does much more than modifying this line. ;)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 27 ++-------
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 86 +++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 8 ++-
> 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> index f4ceb380dd61..24cdef60039a 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> @@ -53,15 +53,9 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vfio_ap, ap_queue_ids);
> */
> static int vfio_ap_queue_dev_probe(struct ap_device *apdev)
> {
> - struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
> -
> - q = kzalloc(sizeof(*q), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!q)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, q);
> - q->apqn = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device)->qid;
> - q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
> - return 0;
> + struct ap_queue *queue = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device);
> +
> + return vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(queue);
> }
You should explain the reason why this function is modified.
>
> /**
> @@ -72,18 +66,9 @@ static int vfio_ap_queue_dev_probe(struct ap_device *apdev)
> */
> static void vfio_ap_queue_dev_remove(struct ap_device *apdev)
> {
> - struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
> - int apid, apqi;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> - q = dev_get_drvdata(&apdev->device);
> - dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, NULL);
> - apid = AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn);
> - apqi = AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn);
> - vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(apid, apqi, 1);
> - vfio_ap_irq_disable(q);
> - kfree(q);
> - mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> + struct ap_queue *queue = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device);
> +
> + vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(queue);
> }
... and this one?
>
> static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index e0bde8518745..ad3925f04f61 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -26,43 +26,26 @@
>
> static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct mdev_device *mdev);
>
> -static int match_apqn(struct device *dev, const void *data)
> -{
> - struct vfio_ap_queue *q = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -
> - return (q->apqn == *(int *)(data)) ? 1 : 0;
> -}
> -
> /**
> - * vfio_ap_get_queue: Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from a list
> - * @matrix_mdev: the associated mediated matrix
> + * vfio_ap_get_queue: Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN.
> * @apqn: The queue APQN
> *
> - * Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from the list of the
> - * devices of the vfio_ap_drv.
> - * Verify that the APID and the APQI are set in the matrix.
> + * Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from the AP queue devices attached to
> + * the AP bus.
> *
> - * Returns the pointer to the associated vfio_ap_queue
> + * Returns the pointer to the vfio_ap_queue with the specified APQN, or NULL.
> */
> -static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_get_queue(
> - struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
> - int apqn)
> +static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_get_queue(unsigned long apqn)
> {
> + struct ap_queue *queue;
> struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
> - struct device *dev;
>
> - if (!test_bit_inv(AP_QID_CARD(apqn), matrix_mdev->matrix.apm))
> - return NULL;
> - if (!test_bit_inv(AP_QID_QUEUE(apqn), matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm))
> + queue = ap_get_qdev(apqn);
> + if (!queue)
> return NULL;
>
> - dev = driver_find_device(&matrix_dev->vfio_ap_drv->driver, NULL,
> - &apqn, match_apqn);
> - if (!dev)
> - return NULL;
> - q = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - q->matrix_mdev = matrix_mdev;
> - put_device(dev);
> + q = dev_get_drvdata(&queue->ap_dev.device);
> + put_device(&queue->ap_dev.device);
>
> return q;
> }
this function changed a lot too, you should explain the goal in the
patch comment.
...snip...
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists