[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159558106988.3847286.6240833838779403056@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:57:49 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, mturquette@...libre.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
qi-ming.wu@...el.com, yixin.zhu@...ux.intel.com,
cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, rahul.tanwar.linux@...il.com,
Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: intel: Use devm_clk_hw_register() instead of clk_hw_register()
Quoting Rahul Tanwar (2020-07-15 23:30:30)
> To ensure that clks are unregistered in case of any failure, use
> devm_clk_hw_register() instead of clk_hw_register().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists