linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 5/5] net: phy: micrel: ksz886x/ksz8081: add cabletest support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200724091507.s7g5ijt7mfussmk2@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:15:07 +0200
From:   Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 5/5] net: phy: micrel: ksz886x/ksz8081: add
 cabletest support

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:12:40PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > OK. So, i'll cover both errata with separate flags? Set flags in the DSA
> > driver and apply workarounds in the PHY. ACK?
> 
> Yes. Assume the issues are limited to just the first PHY in this
> switch. If there are discrete PHYs with the same issue, we can come up
> with a different way to identify them.

I assume, it is not the blocker for the current patch set?

Regards,
Oleksij

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)