[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96fe5db6-2b94-f77e-50d1-75d967a95080@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:16:05 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp.2: Improve x32 and nr truncation notes
Hi Andy
On 7/10/20 8:04 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> ---
> man2/seccomp.2 | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Thanks. Patch applied.
Cheers,
Michael
> diff --git a/man2/seccomp.2 b/man2/seccomp.2
> index a1b1a28db9bf..e491825600e8 100644
> --- a/man2/seccomp.2
> +++ b/man2/seccomp.2
> @@ -342,16 +342,38 @@ is used on the system call number to tell the two ABIs apart.
> .\" an extra instruction in system_call to mask off the extra bit,
> .\" so that the syscall table indexing still works.
> .PP
> -This means that in order to create a seccomp-based
> -deny-list for system calls performed through the x86-64 ABI,
> -it is necessary to not only check that
> -.IR arch
> -equals
> -.BR AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64 ,
> -but also to explicitly reject all system calls that contain
> +This means that a policy must either deny all syscalls with
> .BR __X32_SYSCALL_BIT
> -in
> -.IR nr .
> +or it must recognize syscalls with and without
> +.BR __X32_SYSCALL_BIT
> +set. A list of syscalls to be denied based on
> +.IR nr
> +that does not also contain
> +.IR nr
> +values with
> +.BR __X32_SYSCALL_BIT
> +set can be bypassed by a malicious program that sets
> +.BR __X32_SYSCALL_BIT .
> +.PP
> +Additionally, kernels prior to 5.4 incorrectly permitted
> +.IR nr
> +in the ranges 512-547 as well as the corresponding non-x32 syscalls ored
> +with
> +.BR __X32_SYSCALL_BIT .
> +For example,
> +.IR nr
> +== 521 and
> +.IR nr
> +== (101 |
> +.BR __X32_SYSCALL_BIT )
> +would result in invocations of
> +.BR ptrace (2)
> +with potentially confused x32-vs-x86_64 semantics in the kernel.
> +Policies intended to work on kernels before 5.4 must ensure that they
> +deny or otherwise correctly handle these system calls. On kernels
> +5.4 and newer, such system calls will return -ENOSYS without doing
> +anything.
> +.\" commit 6365b842aae4490ebfafadfc6bb27a6d3cc54757
> .PP
> The
> .I instruction_pointer
> @@ -368,8 +390,8 @@ and
> system calls to prevent the program from subverting such checks.)
> .PP
> When checking values from
> -.IR args
> -against a deny-list, keep in mind that arguments are often
> +.IR args,
> +keep in mind that arguments are often
> silently truncated before being processed, but after the seccomp check.
> For example, this happens if the i386 ABI is used on an
> x86-64 kernel: although the kernel will normally not look beyond
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists