lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200724121918.GL2786714@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:19:18 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/20] unify generic instances of
 csum_partial_copy_nocheck()

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:41:17AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:25:30AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > 
> > quite a few architectures have the same csum_partial_copy_nocheck() -
> > simply memcpy() the data and then return the csum of the copy.
> > 
> > hexagon, parisc, ia64, s390, um: explicitly spelled out that way.
> > 
> > arc, arm64, csky, h8300, m68k/nommu, microblaze, mips/GENERIC_CSUM, nds32,
> > nios2, openrisc, riscv, unicore32: end up picking the same thing spelled
> > out in lib/checksum.h (with varying amounts of perversions along the way).
> > 
> > everybody else (alpha, arm, c6x, m68k/mmu, mips/!GENERIC_CSUM, powerpc,
> > sh, sparc, x86, xtensa) have non-generic variants.  For all except c6x
> > the declaration is in their asm/checksum.h.  c6x uses the wrapper
> > from asm-generic/checksum.h that would normally lead to the lib/checksum.h
> > instance, but in case of c6x we end up using an asm function from arch/c6x
> > instead.
> > 
> > Screw that mess - have architectures with private instances define
> > _HAVE_ARCH_CSUM_AND_COPY in their asm/checksum.h and have the default
> > one right in net/checksum.h conditional on _HAVE_ARCH_CSUM_AND_COPY
> > *not* defined.
> 
> net-next has a patch from me killing off csum_and_copy_from_user
> already:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=f1bfd71c8662f20d53e71ef4e18bfb0e5677c27f

Nothing in that patch of yours touches csum_and_copy_from_user(). what
are you talking about?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ