linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] iommu/arm-smmu: Updates for 5.9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200724122632.GS27672@8bytes.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:26:33 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iommu/arm-smmu: Updates for 5.9

Hi Will,

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:51:09PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Sure, that makes sense to me: I've included a diff below in case anybody
> has comments. I've tackled it slightly differently to how the intel and
> amd drivers are handled, since we have a header file (arm-smmu.h) which
> is shared by a couple of different drivers. I've also moved the v3 driver
> under the arm/ directory as Jean Philippe plans to split out the SVA work
> for 5.10.
> 
> I'll send a second pull early next week if there are no objections (or
> you can pick this patch directly).

Thanks, the diff looks fine to me.


	Joerg