lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYPQ3GGYostoHU=6qg4c_LqoqOZVbZ8gbQbGkNfyGydQjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 18:52:07 +0530
From:   Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To:     Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@...ndries.io>
Cc:     Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, ricardo@...ndries.io,
        Michael Scott <mike@...ndries.io>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] hwrng: optee: fix wait use case

On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:16, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@...ndries.io> wrote:
>
> The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> second read. However the second read would not be executed as the
> while loop exits.
>
> This fix does not wait if all data has been read and reads a second
> time if only partial data was retrieved on the first read.
>
> This fix also does not attempt to read if not data is requested.

I am not sure how this is possible, can you elaborate?

>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@...ndries.io>
> ---
>  v2: tidy up the while loop to avoid reading when no data is requested
>
>  drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
> index 5bc4700c4dae..a99d82949981 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
> @@ -122,14 +122,14 @@ static int optee_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max, bool wait)
>         if (max > MAX_ENTROPY_REQ_SZ)
>                 max = MAX_ENTROPY_REQ_SZ;
>
> -       while (read == 0) {
> +       while (read < max) {
>                 rng_size = get_optee_rng_data(pvt_data, data, (max - read));
>
>                 data += rng_size;
>                 read += rng_size;
>
>                 if (wait && pvt_data->data_rate) {
> -                       if (timeout-- == 0)
> +                       if ((timeout-- == 0) || (read == max))

If read == max, would there be any sleep?

-Sumit

>                                 return read;
>                         msleep((1000 * (max - read)) / pvt_data->data_rate);
>                 } else {
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ