linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI/P2PDMA: Add AMD Zen 2 root complex to the list of allowed bridges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:06:41 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
        Andrew Maier <andrew.maier@...eticom.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/P2PDMA: Add AMD Zen 2 root complex to the list of
 allowed bridges

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:10:52PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> On 2020-07-23 1:57 p.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:01:17PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:43 PM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The AMD Zen 2 root complex (Starship/Matisse) was tested for P2PDMA
> >>> transactions between root ports and found to work. Therefore add it
> >>> to the list.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> >>> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> >>> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> >>> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> >>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Starting with Zen, all AMD platforms support P2P for reads and writes.
> > 
> > What's the plan for getting out of the cycle of "update this list for
> > every new chip"?  Any new _DSMs planned, for instance?
> 
> Well there was an effort to add capabilities in the PCI spec to describe
> this but, as far as I know, they never got anywhere, and hardware still
> doesn't self describe with this.

Any idea what happened?  Is there hope for the future?  I'm really not
happy about signing up for open-ended device-specific patches like
this.  It's certainly not in the plug and play spirit that has made
PCI successful.  I know, preaching to the choir here.

Bjorn