linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: silence soft lockups from unlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200724152424.GC17209@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:24:25 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: silence soft lockups from unlock_page

On 07/23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> But I'll walk over my patch mentally one more time. Here's the current
> version, anyway.

Both patches look correct to me, feel free to add

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

> @@ -1013,18 +1014,40 @@ static int wake_page_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
>  	if (wait_page->bit_nr != key->bit_nr)
>  		return 0;
>
> +	/* Stop walking if it's locked */
> +	if (wait->flags & WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) {
> +		if (test_and_set_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags))
> +			return -1;
> +	} else {
> +		if (test_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags))
> +			return -1;
> +	}

not sure this makes any sense, but this looks like another user of
trylock_page_bit_common(), see the patch below on top of 1/2.

Oleg.

--- mm/filemap.c~	2020-07-24 17:09:34.728133846 +0200
+++ mm/filemap.c	2020-07-24 17:23:52.279185374 +0200
@@ -1000,6 +1000,14 @@
 	wait_queue_entry_t wait;
 };
 
+static int trylock_page_bit_common(struct page *page, int bit_nr,
+					struct wait_queue_entry *wait)
+{
+	return wait->flags & WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE ?
+		!test_and_set_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags) :
+		!test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags);
+}
+
 static int wake_page_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *arg)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -1015,13 +1023,8 @@
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Stop walking if it's locked */
-	if (wait->flags & WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) {
-		if (test_and_set_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags))
-			return -1;
-	} else {
-		if (test_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags))
-			return -1;
-	}
+	if (!trylock_page_bit_common(key->page, key->bit_nr, wait))
+		return -1;
 
 	/*
 	 * Let the waiter know we have done the page flag
@@ -1126,14 +1129,6 @@
 			 */
 };
 
-static inline int trylock_page_bit_common(struct page *page, int bit_nr,
-	enum behavior behavior)
-{
-	return behavior == EXCLUSIVE ?
-		!test_and_set_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags) :
-		!test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags);
-}
-
 static inline int wait_on_page_bit_common(wait_queue_head_t *q,
 	struct page *page, int bit_nr, int state, enum behavior behavior)
 {
@@ -1170,7 +1165,7 @@
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irq(&q->lock);
 	SetPageWaiters(page);
-	if (!trylock_page_bit_common(page, bit_nr, behavior))
+	if (!trylock_page_bit_common(page, bit_nr, wait))
 		__add_wait_queue_entry_tail(q, wait);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&q->lock);