[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1595647858.13250.20.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 11:30:58 +0800
From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
To: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
CC: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "David Airlie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"DRI Development" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [v7, PATCH 7/7] drm/mediatek: add support for mediatek SOC
MT8183
On Sat, 2020-07-25 at 07:24 +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi Yongqiang:
>
> Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com> 於 2020年7月23日 週四 上午10:15寫道:
> >
> > This patch add support for mediatek SOC MT8183
> > 1.ovl_2l share driver with ovl
>
> I think this is done in [1], [2], [3], this patch just add the support
> of mt8183-ovl and mt8183-ovl-2l.
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek?h=v5.8-rc6&id=132c6e250ed745443973cada8db17cdbaebdf551
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek?h=v5.8-rc6&id=318462d1a568634ba09263cc730cb0fb1d56c2b3
> [3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek?h=v5.8-rc6&id=57148baac8b78461e394953cfd5317bde8f795ab
>
> > 2.rdma1 share drive with rdma0, but fifo size is different
>
> I think this is done in [4], this patch just add the support of mt8183-rdma.
>
> [4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11679549/
>
> > 3.add mt8183 mutex private data, and mmsys private data
> > 4.add mt8183 main and external path module for crtc create
>
> The fourth item is the mmsys private data in third item, so you need
> not to repeat it.
>
i will remove some useless description in next version.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 18 ++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 6 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > index 014c1bb..60788c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> >
> > #define MT2701_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x2c
> > #define MT2701_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF0 0x30
> > +#define MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30
> > +#define MT8183_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF0 0x2c
> >
> > #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(n) (0x20 + 0x20 * (n))
> > #define DISP_REG_MUTEX(n) (0x24 + 0x20 * (n))
> > @@ -25,6 +27,18 @@
> >
> > #define INT_MUTEX BIT(1)
> >
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0 0
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA1 1
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0 9
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0_2L 10
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1_2L 11
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA0 12
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0 13
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR0 14
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL0 15
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA0 16
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0 17
> > +
> > #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0 11
> > #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1 12
> > #define MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0 13
> > @@ -74,6 +88,10 @@
> > #define MUTEX_SOF_DSI2 5
> > #define MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 6
> >
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 2
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DSI0 (MUTEX_SOF_DSI0 << 6)
> > +#define MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DPI0 (MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 << 6)
> > +
> >
> > struct mtk_disp_mutex {
> > int id;
> > @@ -153,6 +171,20 @@ struct mtk_ddp {
> > [DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA1] = MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA1,
> > };
> >
> > +static const unsigned int mt8183_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_AAL0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_GAMMA] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL0_2L,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_OVL_2L1] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_OVL1_2L,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA0,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_RDMA1,
> > + [DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA0] = MT8183_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA0,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const unsigned int mt2712_mutex_sof[DDP_MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 + 1] = {
> > [DDP_MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE] = MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE,
> > [DDP_MUTEX_SOF_DSI0] = MUTEX_SOF_DSI0,
> > @@ -163,6 +195,12 @@ struct mtk_ddp {
> > [DDP_MUTEX_SOF_DSI3] = MUTEX_SOF_DSI3,
> > };
> >
> > +static const unsigned int mt8183_mutex_sof[DDP_MUTEX_SOF_DSI3 + 1] = {
> > + [DDP_MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE] = MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE,
> > + [DDP_MUTEX_SOF_DSI0] = MUTEX_SOF_DSI0 | MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DSI0,
>
> I think this array is for 'sof', so you should drop MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DSI0.
>
> > + [DDP_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0] = MT8183_MUTEX_SOF_DPI0 | MT8183_MUTEX_EOF_DPI0,
>
> Ditto.
we need set EOF at the same on MT8183, that is different with before SoC
EOF and SOF are location in the same hardware register.
>
> Regards,
> Chun-Kuang.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct mtk_ddp_data mt2701_ddp_driver_data = {
> > .mutex_mod = mt2701_mutex_mod,
> > .mutex_sof = mt2712_mutex_sof,
> > @@ -184,6 +222,13 @@ struct mtk_ddp {
> > .mutex_sof_reg = MT2701_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF0,
> > };
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists