linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] crypto: remove ARC4 support from the skcipher API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXHA2R1UDcYROwiLgUQCrOpNWxt-BAP0aBD=3RP4HbcOnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 10:06:04 +0300
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Denis Kenzior <denkenz@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BPF JIT for MIPS (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] crypto: remove ARC4 support from the skcipher API

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 11:18, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 02:04, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 20:21, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 19:50, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [+linux-wireless, Marcel Holtmann, and Denis Kenzior]
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:19:44PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > Remove the generic ecb(arc4) skcipher, which is slightly cumbersome from
> > > > > a maintenance perspective, since it does not quite behave like other
> > > > > skciphers do in terms of key vs IV lifetime. Since we are leaving the
> > > > > library interface in place, which is used by the various WEP and TKIP
> > > > > implementations we have in the tree, we can safely drop this code now
> > > > > it no longer has any users.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Last year there was a discussion where it was mentioned that iwd uses
> > > > "ecb(arc4)" via AF_ALG.  So can we really remove it yet?
> > > > See https://lkml.kernel.org/r/97BB95F6-4A4C-4984-9EAB-6069E19B4A4F@holtmann.org
> > > > Note that the code isn't in "iwd" itself but rather in "libell" which iwd
> > > > depends on: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/ell/ell.git/
> > > >
> > > > Apparently it also uses md4 and ecb(des) too.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah yes, I remember now :-(
> > >
> > > > Marcel and Denis, what's your deprecation plan for these obsolete and insecure
> > > > algorithms?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Given Denis's statement:
> > >
> > >   It sounds to me like it was broken and should be fixed.  So our vote /
> > >   preference is to have ARC4 fixed to follow the proper semantics.  We
> > >   can deal with the kernel behavioral change on our end easily enough;
> > >   the required workarounds are the worse evil.
> > >
> > > I would think that an ABI break is not the end of the world for them,
> > > and given how trivial it is to implement RC4 in C, the workaround
> > > should be to simply implement RC4 in user space, and not even bother
> > > trying to use AF_ALG to get at ecb(arc4)
> > >
> > > (same applies to md4 and ecb(des) btw)
> > >
> > > There will always be a long tail of use cases, and at some point, we
> > > just have to draw the line and remove obsolete and insecure cruft,
> > > especially when it impedes progress on other fronts.
> > >
> >
> > I have ported iwd to Nettle's LGPL 2.1 implementation of ARC4, and the
> > diffstat is
> >
> >  src/crypto.c      | 80 ++++++++++++--------
> >  src/main.c        |  8 --
> >  unit/test-eapol.c |  3 +-
> >  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/iwd.git/log/?h=arc4-cleanup
>
> Marcel, Denis,
>
> Do you have any objections to the ecb(arc4) skcipher being dropped
> from the kernel, given the fallback i proposed above (which is a much
> better way of doing rc4 in user space anyway)?
>
> For libell, I would suggest dropping rc4 entirely, once iwd stops
> relying on it, as using rc4 for tls is obsolete as well.

Ping?