linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] mm/hugetlb: add mempolicy check in the reservation routine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200725080749.70470-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:07:49 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     mike.kravetz@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org
Cc:     rientjes@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, walken@...gle.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Jianchao Guo <guojianchao@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] mm/hugetlb: add mempolicy check in the reservation routine

In the reservation routine, we only check whether the cpuset meets
the memory allocation requirements. But we ignore the mempolicy of
MPOL_BIND case. If someone mmap hugetlb succeeds, but the subsequent
memory allocation may fail due to mempolicy restrictions and receives
the SIGBUS signal. This can be reproduced by the follow steps.

 1) Compile the test case.
    cd tools/testing/selftests/vm/
    gcc map_hugetlb.c -o map_hugetlb

 2) Pre-allocate huge pages. Suppose there are 2 numa nodes in the
    system. Each node will pre-allocate one huge page.
    echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages

 3) Run test case(mmap 4MB). We receive the SIGBUS signal.
    numactl --membind=0 ./map_hugetlb 4

With this patch applied, the mmap will fail in the step 3) and throw
"mmap: Cannot allocate memory".

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Reported-by: Jianchao Guo <guojianchao@...edance.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
---
chagelog in v3:
 1) Do not allocate nodemask on the stack.
 2) Update comment.

changelog in v2:
 1) Reuse policy_nodemask().

 include/linux/mempolicy.h |  1 +
 mm/hugetlb.c              | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 mm/mempolicy.c            |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
index ea9c15b60a96..6b9640f1c990 100644
--- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ extern int huge_node(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 extern bool init_nodemask_of_mempolicy(nodemask_t *mask);
 extern bool mempolicy_nodemask_intersects(struct task_struct *tsk,
 				const nodemask_t *mask);
+extern nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy);
 extern unsigned int mempolicy_slab_node(void);
 
 extern enum zone_type policy_zone;
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 589c330df4db..6f8e79e76676 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3463,13 +3463,22 @@ static int __init default_hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
 }
 __setup("default_hugepagesz=", default_hugepagesz_setup);
 
-static unsigned int cpuset_mems_nr(unsigned int *array)
+static unsigned int allowed_mems_nr(struct hstate *h)
 {
 	int node;
 	unsigned int nr = 0;
+	struct mempolicy *mpol = get_task_policy(current);
+	nodemask_t *mpol_allowed;
+	unsigned int *array = h->free_huge_pages_node;
+	gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h);
+
+	mpol_allowed = policy_nodemask(gfp_mask, mpol);
 
-	for_each_node_mask(node, cpuset_current_mems_allowed)
-		nr += array[node];
+	for_each_node_mask(node, cpuset_current_mems_allowed) {
+		if (!mpol_allowed ||
+		    (mpol_allowed && node_isset(node, *mpol_allowed)))
+			nr += array[node];
+	}
 
 	return nr;
 }
@@ -3648,12 +3657,18 @@ static int hugetlb_acct_memory(struct hstate *h, long delta)
 	 * we fall back to check against current free page availability as
 	 * a best attempt and hopefully to minimize the impact of changing
 	 * semantics that cpuset has.
+	 *
+	 * Apart from cpuset, we also have memory policy mechanism that
+	 * also determines from which node the kernel will allocate memory
+	 * in a NUMA system. So similar to cpuset, we also should consider
+	 * the memory policy of the current task. Similar to the description
+	 * above.
 	 */
 	if (delta > 0) {
 		if (gather_surplus_pages(h, delta) < 0)
 			goto out;
 
-		if (delta > cpuset_mems_nr(h->free_huge_pages_node)) {
+		if (delta > allowed_mems_nr(h)) {
 			return_unused_surplus_pages(h, delta);
 			goto out;
 		}
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 93fcfc1f2fa2..fce14c3f4f38 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@ static int apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
  * Return a nodemask representing a mempolicy for filtering nodes for
  * page allocation
  */
-static nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
+nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
 {
 	/* Lower zones don't get a nodemask applied for MPOL_BIND */
 	if (unlikely(policy->mode == MPOL_BIND) &&
-- 
2.11.0