lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200725100555.GA1073708@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 12:05:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/19] Introduce partial kernel_read_file() support

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:36:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> v3:
> - add reviews/acks
> - add "IMA: Add support for file reads without contents" patch
> - trim CC list, in case that's why vger ignored v2
> v2: [missing from lkml archives! (CC list too long?) repeating changes here]
> - fix issues in firmware test suite
> - add firmware partial read patches
> - various bug fixes/cleanups
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200717174309.1164575-1-keescook@chromium.org/
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Here's my tree for adding partial read support in kernel_read_file(),
> which fixes a number of issues along the way. It's got Scott's firmware
> and IMA patches ported and everything tests cleanly for me (even with
> CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE=y).
> 
> I think the intention is for this to go via Greg's tree since Scott's
> driver code will depend on it?

I've applied the first 3 now, as I think I need some acks/reviewed-by
from the subsystem owners of the other patches before I can take them.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ