[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfKeTCBOne3tDSM46q6m_FE+7hS3H9Hx5C3RRPvueqZAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:44:44 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@...gaas.com>,
Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: use generic power management
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:42 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:37 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:16:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > If it's a bug that spi-topcliff-pch.c disables but never enables
> > wakeup, I think this should turn into two patches:
> >
> > 1) Fix the bug by enabling wakeup in suspend (or whatever the right
> > fix is), and
> >
> > 2) Convert to generic PM, which may involve removing the
> > wakeup-related code completely.
>
> Works for me.
The only problem here, is that the 2nd is already in the Mark's tree
and he doesn't do rebases.
So, it will be the other way around.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists