[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPBb6MWG5aXuc7ExiaKvgtLL0o=HDYKFa4D4-v8hfvyGiNFBdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 23:45:41 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Jeffrey Kardatzke <jkardatzke@...omium.org>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] media: hantro: Don't require unneeded H264_SLICE_PARAMS
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 5:23 AM Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Now that slice invariant parameters have been moved,
> the driver no longer needs this control, so drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c | 5 -----
> drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h264.c | 5 -----
> drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> index 34797507f214..3cd00cc0a364 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> @@ -306,11 +306,6 @@ static const struct hantro_ctrl controls[] = {
> .cfg = {
> .id = V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_DECODE_PARAMS,
> },
> - }, {
> - .codec = HANTRO_H264_DECODER,
> - .cfg = {
> - .id = V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_SLICE_PARAMS,
> - },
Isn't this going to make the driver reject (as opposed to just ignore)
this control altogether? Also, even though the control is not required
anymore, don't we want to check that it is provided in order to ensure
user-space follows the spec (granted, this would be better done in a
common framework shared by all drivers).
I'd also suggest this patch (and the following one) to be merged into
the previous one as they are just removing fields that have become
unneeded because of it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists