[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADQ2G_G7N_iH523urk3wOieZ0bT7O88Vnnbq6r_h9A4GLXQ5Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:55:33 +0200
From: Martin Botka <martin.botka1@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@...eaurora.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period
with u64 data length
Hello,
As can be seen this divides llu by llu in few warnings and error.
At the time of sending i didn't realize it but this fails on 32 bit
architectures.
So i would like to ask how would you like this fixed ?
Using macro or some other way ?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists