[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADQ2G_FmvAS_fzDzENxgx+G0JUiktgRvKL=LLCc1cYE=nATUDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 17:30:57 +0200
From: Martin Botka <martin.botka1@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@...eaurora.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period
with u64 data length
> +#include <linux/math64.h>
> - gain_q23 = (gain_q23 * dmic->boost_gain) / 100;
> + gain_q23 = div_u64(gain_q23 * dmic->boost_gain, 100);
Ok so using a macro.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists