linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC leds + net-next v3 2/2] net: phy: marvell: add support for PHY LEDs via LED class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 19:39:50 +0200
From:   Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com,
        Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC leds + net-next v3 2/2] net: phy: marvell: add
 support for PHY LEDs via LED class

On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 17:03:42 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

> Does hi-z mean off? In the implementation i did, i did not list off
> and on as triggers. I instead used them for untriggered
> brightness. That allowed the software triggers to work, so i had the
> PHY blinking the heartbeat etc. But i had to make it optional, since a
> quick survey of datasheets suggested not all PHYs support simple
> on/off control.

I don't actually know what hi-z means, but enabling it disabled the LED.
But there is another register value for OFF...

> Something beyond the scope of this patchset is implementing etHool -p
> 
>        -p --identify
>               Initiates adapter-specific action intended to enable an operator to
> 	      easily identify the adapter by sight. Typically this involves  blink‐
>               ing one or more LEDs on the specific network port.
> 
> If we have software controlled on/off, then a software trigger seems
> like i good way to do this.

I'll look into this.

Marek