[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200725182335.GN1472201@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 20:23:35 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC leds + net-next v3 2/2] net: phy: marvell: add
support for PHY LEDs via LED class
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 08:02:24PM +0200, Marek Behun wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 19:23:18 +0200
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for controlling the LEDs connected to several
> > > families of Marvell PHYs via the PHY HW LED trigger API. These families
> > > are: 88E1112, 88E1121R, 88E1240, 88E1340S, 88E1510 and 88E1545. More can
> > > be added.
> > >
> > > The code reads LEDs definitions from the device-tree node of the PHY.
> > >
> > > This patch does not yet add support for compound LED modes. This could
> > > be achieved via the LED multicolor framework (which is not yet in
> > > upstream).
> > >
> > > Settings such as HW blink rate or pulse stretch duration are not yet
> > > supported, nor are LED polarity settings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > drivers/net/phy/marvell.c | 364 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 365 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> > > index ffea11f73acd..5428a8af26d2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> > > @@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ config LXT_PHY
> > >
> > > config MARVELL_PHY
> > > tristate "Marvell PHYs"
> > > + depends on LED_TRIGGER_PHY_HW
> >
> > Does it really depend on it? I think the driver will work fine without
> > it, just the LED control will be missing.
> >
> > It is really a policy question. Cable test is always available, there
> > is no Kconfig'ury to stop it getting built. Is LED support really big
> > so that somebody might want to disable it? I think not. So lets just
> > enable it all the time.
>
> OK
>
> > > help
> > > Currently has a driver for the 88E1011S
> > >
> >
> > > +enum {
> > > + L1V0_RECV = BIT(0),
> > > + L1V0_COPPER = BIT(1),
> > > + L1V5_100_FIBER = BIT(2),
> > > + L1V5_100_10 = BIT(3),
> > > + L2V2_INIT = BIT(4),
> > > + L2V2_PTP = BIT(5),
> > > + L2V2_DUPLEX = BIT(6),
> > > + L3V0_FIBER = BIT(7),
> > > + L3V0_LOS = BIT(8),
> > > + L3V5_TRANS = BIT(9),
> > > + L3V7_FIBER = BIT(10),
> > > + L3V7_DUPLEX = BIT(11),
COMMON = BIT(32),
> > > +static const struct marvell_led_mode_info marvell_led_mode_info[] = {
> > > + { "link/act", { 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "1Gbps/100Mbps/10Mbps", { 0x2, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "act", { 0x3, 0x3, 0x3, 0x3, 0x3, 0x3, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "blink-act", { 0x4, 0x4, 0x4, 0x4, 0x4, 0x4, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "tx", { 0x5, -1, 0x5, -1, 0x5, 0x5, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "tx", { -1, -1, -1, 0x5, -1, -1, }, L3V5_TRANS },
> > > + { "rx", { -1, -1, -1, -1, 0x0, 0x0, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "rx", { -1, 0x0, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, L1V0_RECV },
> > > + { "copper", { 0x6, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "copper", { -1, 0x0, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, L1V0_COPPER },
> > > + { "1Gbps", { 0x7, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "link/rx", { -1, 0x2, -1, 0x2, 0x2, 0x2, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "100Mbps-fiber", { -1, 0x5, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, L1V5_100_FIBER },
> > > + { "100Mbps-10Mbps", { -1, 0x5, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, L1V5_100_10 },
> > > + { "1Gbps-100Mbps", { -1, 0x6, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "1Gbps-10Mbps", { -1, -1, 0x6, 0x6, -1, -1, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "100Mbps", { -1, 0x7, -1, -1, -1, -1, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "10Mbps", { -1, -1, 0x7, -1, -1, -1, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "fiber", { -1, -1, -1, 0x0, -1, -1, }, L3V0_FIBER },
> > > + { "fiber", { -1, -1, -1, 0x7, -1, -1, }, L3V7_FIBER },
> > > + { "FullDuplex", { -1, -1, -1, 0x7, -1, -1, }, L3V7_DUPLEX },
> > > + { "FullDuplex", { -1, -1, -1, -1, 0x6, 0x6, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "FullDuplex/collision", { -1, -1, -1, -1, 0x7, 0x7, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "FullDuplex/collision", { -1, -1, 0x2, -1, -1, -1, }, L2V2_DUPLEX },
> > > + { "ptp", { -1, -1, 0x2, -1, -1, -1, }, L2V2_PTP },
> > > + { "init", { -1, -1, 0x2, -1, -1, -1, }, L2V2_INIT },
> > > + { "los", { -1, -1, -1, 0x0, -1, -1, }, L3V0_LOS },
> > > + { "hi-z", { 0xa, 0xa, 0xa, 0xa, 0xa, 0xa, }, COMMON },
> > > + { "blink", { 0xb, 0xb, 0xb, 0xb, 0xb, 0xb, }, COMMON },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct marvell_leds_info marvell_leds_info[] = {
> > > + LED(1112, 4, COMMON | L1V0_COPPER | L1V5_100_FIBER | L2V2_INIT | L3V0_LOS | L3V5_TRANS | L3V7_FIBER),
> > > + LED(1121R, 3, COMMON | L1V5_100_10),
> > > + LED(1240, 6, COMMON | L3V5_TRANS),
> > > + LED(1340S, 6, COMMON | L1V0_COPPER | L1V5_100_FIBER | L2V2_PTP | L3V0_FIBER | L3V7_DUPLEX),
> > > + LED(1510, 3, COMMON | L1V0_RECV | L1V5_100_FIBER | L2V2_DUPLEX),
> > > + LED(1545, 6, COMMON | L1V5_100_FIBER | L3V0_FIBER | L3V7_DUPLEX),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +{
> > > + return mode->regval[led->idx] != -1 && (!mode->flags || (priv->led_flags & mode->flags));
This then becomes
return mode->regval[led->idx] != -1 && (priv->led_flags & mode->flags));
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists