[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJeY4oHzL2q1yRDQweSK5CM5WdHrWqqPVhkNc5DPzP1ayJLw+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 16:29:35 -0300
From: Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@...il.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Sidong Yang <realwakka@...il.com>,
Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
kernel-usp@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vkms: add missing drm_crtc_vblank_put to the get/put
pair on flush
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 4:19 PM Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > No, this very first warning continues (only once) :(
> > From here (drm_crtc_vblank_on):
> > if (atomic_read(&vblank->refcount) != 0 || drm_vblank_offdelay == 0)
> > drm_WARN_ON(dev, drm_vblank_enable(dev, pipe));
>
> Sorry, not sure when this warning is triggered.
Again, I just had to look at the trace:
[ 52.299388] drm_get_last_vbltimestamp+0xaa/0xc0 [drm]
[ 52.299389] drm_reset_vblank_timestamp+0x5b/0xd0 [drm]
[ 52.299389] drm_crtc_vblank_on.cold+0x37/0x103 [drm]
[ 52.299390] drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enable
>
> >
> > > But I'm still wondering why after step 3 we don't get -EINVAL from
> > > vblank_get() - after vblank_off() vblank->enabled should be false
> > > again, getting us back to the same state as after 1. Is that not
> > > happening?
> >
> > Yes (sorry if it got confused), we got -EINVAL after setp 3:
> >
> > In step 3, at the end of the 2nd running, we have:
> > atomic_disable
> > --> vblank_off [!vblank->inmodeset + refcount going 0->1 + inmodeset=1]
> > and then in next vblank_get: -EINVAL (!vblank->enabled + refcount ends 1)
> > as in the first step.
> >
> > Melissa
> >
> > > -Daniel
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > -Sidong
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > crtc->state->event = NULL;
> > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > 2.27.0
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Daniel Vetter
> > > > > > > > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > > > > > > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Daniel Vetter
> > > > > > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > > > > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > > > > dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > > > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Daniel Vetter
> > > > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Vetter
> > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists