linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] staging: media: atomisp: fix style of block comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200726091209.GA451376@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jul 2020 11:12:09 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Rohit K Bharadwaj <bharadwaj.rohit8@...il.com>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] staging: media: atomisp: fix style of block
 comments

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 02:35:10PM +0530, Rohit K Bharadwaj wrote:
> this patch fixes the coding style of block comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit K Bharadwaj <bharadwaj.rohit8@...il.com>
> ---
> v3: change patch subject prefix
> v2: split patch into sequence of patches 
> v1: fix all coding style issues in single patch
> 
>  .../media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_firmware.c       | 28 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_firmware.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_firmware.c
> index d4ab15b6d1ac..2907aead98b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_firmware.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_firmware.c
> @@ -51,9 +51,12 @@ struct fw_param {
>  
>  static struct firmware_header *firmware_header;
>  
> -/* The string STR is a place holder
> +/*
> + * The string STR is a place holder
>   * which will be replaced with the actual RELEASE_VERSION
> - * during package generation. Please do not modify  */
> + * during package generation. Please do not modify
> + */
> +

Why the blank line?