[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15cab987-6eaa-9137-0f70-4735b3fea87f@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:04:30 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To: Vaishnav M A <vaishnav@...gleboard.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de, johan@...nel.org,
elder@...nel.org
Cc: rajkovic@...roe.com, robh@...nel.org, mchehab+huawei@...nel.org,
robertcnelson@...gleboard.org, drew@...gleboard.org,
davem@...emloft.net, zoran.stojsavljevic@...il.com
Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] RFC : mikroBUS driver for add-on boards
On 7/24/20 7:06 AM, Vaishnav M A wrote:
> Attached is a patch for the mikroBUS driver which helps to
> instantiate an add-on board device on a mikrobus port by fetching
> the device identifier manifest binary from an EEPROM on-board
> the device. mikroBUS is an add-on board socket standard by
> MikroElektronika that can be freely used by anyone
> following the guidelines, more details and discussions on
> the status of the driver can be found here in this eLinux wiki:
> https://elinux.org/Mikrobus
I had some other things I would comment on in this code review,
but there are a lot of somewhat superficial things you should
fix. I looked at much--but not all--of this, and I'll want to
review this again after you've fixed the simple things. I also
can provide more substantive feedback after I've had more time
to digest the bigger picture of microBUS.
You should assume it will take a few iterations to get to the
point where things are shaping up for acceptance.
All that said, your basic foundation looks good.
> In the current state of the driver, more than 80 different
> add-on boards have been tested on the BeagleBoard.org
> PocketBeagle and the manifest binary is generated using the same
> manifesto tool used to generate Greybus manifest binaries,
> The pull request to manifesto to add new descriptors specific
> to mikrobus is here : https://github.com/projectara/manifesto/pull/2
> The utilization of Greybus manifest binaries here is not entirely
> coincidental, We are evaluating ways to add mikroBUS sockets and
> devices via Greybus expansion.
>
> The mikroBUS standard includes SPI, I2C, UART, PWM, ADC, GPIO
> and power (3.3V and 5V) connections to interface common embedded
> peripherals, There are more than 750 add-on boards ranging from
> wireless connectivity boards to human-machine interface sensors
> which conform to the mikroBUS standard, out of which more than 140
> boards already have support in the Linux kernel.Today, there is no
> mainlinesolution for enabling mikroBUS add-on boards at run-time, the
> most straight forward method for loading drivers is to provide
> device-tree overlay fragments at boot time, this method suffers
> from the need to maintain a large out-of-tree database for which there
> is need to maintain an overlay for every mikroBUS add-on board for every
> Linux system and for every mikroBUS socket on that system.
>
> The mikroBUS driver tries to solve the problem by using extended version
> of the greybus manifest to describe the add-on board device specific
> information required by the device driver and uses it along with the fixed
> port specific information to probe the specific device driver.The manifest
> binary is now fetched from an I2C EEPROM over the I2C bus on the mikroBUS
> port(subject to change in mikroBUS v3 specification) and enumerate drivers
> for the add-on devices.There is also ongoing work to define a mikroBUS
> v3 standard in which the addon board includes a non-volatile storage to
> store the device identifier manifest binary, once the mikroBUS v3 standard
> is released, the mikroBUS can be seen as a probeable bus such that the
> kernel can discover the device on the bus at boot time.
>
> The driver also has a few debug SysFS interfaces for testing on add-on
> boards without an EEPROM, these can be used in the following manner:
> (example for mikroBUS port 1 on BeagleBoard.org PocketBeagle):
You should probably use debugfs, since this is a temporary thing.
But I guess if it's not actually upstream (and it sounds like you
might be avoiding the need for this with EEPROM anyway) maybe
that doesn't matter much.
> printf "%b" '\x01\x00\x00\x59\x32\x17' > /sys/bus/mikrobus/add_port
>
> The bytes in the byte array sequence are (in order):
>
> * i2c_adap_nr
> * spi_master_nr
> * serdev_ctlr_nr
> * rst_gpio_nr
> * pwm_gpio_nr
> * int_gpio_nr
> * add_port sysFS entry is purely for debug and in the actual state
> of the driver, port configuration will be loaded from a suitable
> device tree overlay fragment.
>
> echo 0 > /sys/bus/mikrobus/del_port (to delete the attached port)
> echo 1 > /sys/class/mikrobus-port/mikrobus-0/rescan (to rescan the EEPROM
> contents on the I2C bus on the mikroBUS port).
>
> cat board_manifest.mnfb > /sys/class/mikrobus-port/mikrobus-0/new_device
> * debug interface to pass the manifest binary in case an EEPROM is absent
> echo 0 > /sys/class/mikrobus-port/mikrobus-0/delete_device
> * to unload the loaded board on the mikrobus port
>
> These sysFS interfaces are only implemented for debug purposes and
> in the actual implementation of the driver these will be removed and
> the manifest binary will be fetched from the non volatile storage on-board
> the device.
>
> The mikroBUS driver enable the mikroBUS to be a probeable bus such that
> the kernel can discover the device and automatically load the drivers.
> There are already several Linux platforms with mikroBUS sockets and the
> mikroBUS driver helps to reduce the time to develop and debug
> support for various mikroBUS add-on boards. Further, it opens up
> the possibility for support under dynamically instantiated buses
> such as with Greybus.
>
> Please let know the feedback you have on this patch or the approach used.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vaishnav M A
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaishnav M A <vaishnav@...gleboard.org>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 6 +
> drivers/misc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/mikrobus/Kconfig | 16 +
> drivers/misc/mikrobus/Makefile | 5 +
> drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.c | 649 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.h | 130 +++++
> drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.c | 390 +++++++++++++
> drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.h | 21 +
> include/linux/greybus/greybus_manifest.h | 53 ++
> 10 files changed, 1272 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/mikrobus/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/mikrobus/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.h
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index d53db30d1365..9a049746203f 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -11402,6 +11402,12 @@ M: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
> S: Maintained
> F: drivers/usb/image/microtek.*
>
> +MIKROBUS ADDON BOARD DRIVER
> +M: Vaishnav M A <vaishnav@...gleboard.org>
> +S: Maintained
> +W: https://elinux.org/Mikrobus
> +F: drivers/misc/mikrobus/
> +
> MIPS
> M: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
> L: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> index e1b1ba5e2b92..334f0c39d56b 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> @@ -472,4 +472,5 @@ source "drivers/misc/ocxl/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/misc/cardreader/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/misc/habanalabs/Kconfig"
> source "drivers/misc/uacce/Kconfig"
> +source "drivers/misc/mikrobus/Kconfig"
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> index c7bd01ac6291..45486dd77da5 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VMWARE_BALLOON) += vmw_balloon.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCH_PHUB) += pch_phub.o
> obj-y += ti-st/
> obj-y += lis3lv02d/
> +obj-y += mikrobus/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_STAPL) +=altera-stapl/
> obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_MEI) += mei/
> obj-$(CONFIG_VMWARE_VMCI) += vmw_vmci/
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mikrobus/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c3b93e12daad
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +menuconfig MIKROBUS
> + tristate "Module for instantiating devices on mikroBUS ports"
> + help
> + This option enables the mikroBUS driver. mikroBUS is an add-on
> + board socket standard that offers maximum expandability with
> + the smallest number of pins. The mikroBUS driver helps in
> + instantiating devices on the mikroBUS port with identifier
> + data fetched from an EEPROM on the device, more details on
> + the mikroBUS driver support and discussion can be found in
> + this eLinux wiki : elinux.org/Mikrobus
This text could be cleaned up a bit. For example:
The mikroBUS driver instantiates devices on a mikroBUS port
described by identifying data present in device-resident EEPROM.
Using well-defined terms can help a lot. Is a physical thing that
plugs into a microbus port called a "board"? Can a "board" present
more than one device to the system? Is the EEPROM associated with
the board, or a device? My point isn't that those answers belong
here, but that having meaningful terms can help you describe things
concisely.
> + Say Y here to enable support for this driver.
> +
> + To compile this code as a module, chose M here: the module
> + will be called mikrobus.ko
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mikrobus/Makefile b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1f80ed4064d8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# mikroBUS Core
> +
> +mikrobus-y := mikrobus_core.o mikrobus_manifest.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MIKROBUS) += mikrobus.o
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.c b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..78c96c637632
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,649 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * mikroBUS driver for instantiating add-on
> + * board devices with an identifier EEPROM
> + *
> + * Copyright 2020 Vaishnav M A, BeagleBoard.org Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "mikrobus: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> +#include <linux/serdev.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "mikrobus_core.h"
> +#include "mikrobus_manifest.h"
> +
> +#define ATMEL_24C32_I2C_ADDR 0x57
I'm just getting started looking through this, so maybe I'll find
out soon. But why is this ATMEL I2C address needed in the core code?
> +static DEFINE_IDR(mikrobus_port_idr);
> +static struct class_compat *mikrobus_port_compat_class;
> +static bool is_registered;
> +
> +static ssize_t add_port_store(struct bus_type *bt, const char *buf,
> + size_t count)
> +{
> + struct mikrobus_port_config *cfg;
> +
> + if (count < sizeof(*cfg)) {
Perhaps this should be:
if (count != sizeof(*cfg)) {
> + pr_err("add_port: incorrect config data received: %s\n", buf);
I don't think you need to include "add_port: ".
This is binary data you are writing to this sysfs file, correct?
Don't try to interpret it as a string. You could avoid the problem
with something more like:
pr_err("bad port config size (%zu, should be %zu)", count, sizeof(*cfg));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + mikrobus_register_port_config((void *)buf);
mikrobus_register_port_config() returns an error value, and
that should be returned from this function if it's non-zero.
Don't cast the buffer to a void pointer; cast it to the actual
type represents (struct mikrobus_port_config *).
> + return count;
> +}
> +BUS_ATTR_WO(add_port);
> +
> +static ssize_t del_port_store(struct bus_type *bt, const char *buf,
> + size_t count)
> +{
> + int id;
> + char end;
> + int res;
> +
> + res = sscanf(buf, "%d%c", &id, &end);
The id value you pass to idr_find() is an unsigned long.
You might as well define "id" with that type and scan that
type here. Make sure it's in the valid range for your
identifier as a separate step. (There might be a good
reason you use a signed int as an identifier, but I would
recommend unsigned, with a well-defined number of bits,
such as u32).
Is "end" intended to just consume an optional trailing newline?
> + if (res < 1) {
> + pr_err("delete_port: cannot parse mikrobus port ID\n");
I don't think "delete_port: " here is necessary. (Take this
comment to apply in all similar cases; I won't mention it
again.)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (!idr_find(&mikrobus_port_idr, id)) {
> + pr_err("attempting to delete unregistered port [%d]\n", id);
Maybe just "mikrobus port %lu not registered".
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + mikrobus_del_port(idr_find(&mikrobus_port_idr, id));
> + return count;
> +}
> +BUS_ATTR_WO(del_port);
> +
> +static struct attribute *mikrobus_attrs[] = {
> + &bus_attr_add_port.attr,
> + &bus_attr_del_port.attr,
> + NULL
> +};
> +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(mikrobus);
> +
> +struct bus_type mikrobus_bus_type = {
> + .name = "mikrobus",
> + .bus_groups = mikrobus_groups,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mikrobus_bus_type);
> +
> +static int mikrobus_manifest_header_validate(struct mikrobus_port *port)
> +{
> + char header[12];
> + struct addon_board_info *board;
> + int manifest_size;
> + int retval;
> + char *buf;
> +
> + nvmem_device_read(port->eeprom, 0, 12, header);
This function returns a value, and if it's less than zero you
should return it as the result of mikrobus_manifest_header_validate()
(possibly after reporting an error).
> + manifest_size = mikrobus_manifest_header_validate(header, 12);
> + if (manifest_size > 0) {
> + buf = kzalloc(manifest_size, GFP_KERNEL);
Check whether kzalloc() returns NULL, and if so, return -ENOMEM.
> + nvmem_device_read(port->eeprom, 0, manifest_size, buf);
Check the return value here, and if negative, free your buffer
and return the error. (I won't make this comment any more if
I see other instances of ignoring the nvmem_device_read()
return value.)
> + board = kzalloc(sizeof(*board), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!board)
> + return -ENOMEM;
You need to free the buffer you allocated before you return here.
It is helpful to use the "goto <error path>" pattern. I.e.:
if (!board) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_buf;
}
...
err_free_buf:
kfree(buf);
return retval;
}
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&board->manifest_descs);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&board->devices);
> + retval = mikrobus_manifest_parse(board, (void *)buf, manifest_size);
No need to cast buf to (void *).
I have more comments on mikrobus_manifest_parse() below. But it
might be useful to have it return an integer (0 or error code)
rather than Boolean. Assuming you did that...
> + if (!retval) {
> + pr_err("failed to parse manifest, size: %d", manifest_size);
if (retval)
goto err_free_board;
...
err_free_board:
free_board(board);
err_free_buf:
free_buf(buf);
return retval;
}
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + retval = mikrobus_register_board(port, board);
> + if (retval) {
> + pr_err("failed to register board: %s", board->name);
goto err_free_board;
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + kfree(buf);
> + } else {
> + pr_err("inavlide manifest port %d", port->id);
s/inavlide/invalid/
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t name_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", to_mikrobus_port(dev)->name);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name);
> +
> +static ssize_t new_device_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct mikrobus_port *port = to_mikrobus_port(dev);
> + struct addon_board_info *board;
> + int retval;
> +
> + if (port->board == NULL) {
This is just a style suggestion, but I would prefer this, because it
reduces the indentation of the normal path:
if (port->board) {
pr_err("mikrobus port %d already has a board registered\n",
port->id);
return -EBUSY;
}
port->board = kzalloc(...);
if (!port->board)
return -ENOMEM;
Also note the return values I suggest here.
> + board = kzalloc(sizeof(*board), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!board)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&board->manifest_descs);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&board->devices);
> + } else {
> + pr_err("port %d already has board registered", port->id);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + retval = mikrobus_manifest_parse(board, (void *)buf, count);
> + if (!retval) {
> + pr_err("failed to parse manifest");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + retval = mikrobus_register_board(port, board);
> + if (retval) {
> + pr_err("failed to register board: %s", board->name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(new_device);
> +
> +static ssize_t rescan_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct mikrobus_port *port = to_mikrobus_port(dev);
> + int id;
> + char end;
> + int res;
> + int retval;
> +
> + res = sscanf(buf, "%d%c", &id, &end);
> + if (res < 1) {
> + pr_err("rescan: Can't parse trigger\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (port->board != NULL) {
> + pr_err("port %d already has board registered", port->id);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + retval = mikrobus_port_scan_eeprom(port);
> + if (retval) {
> + pr_err("port %d board register from manifest failed", port->id);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(rescan);
> +
> +static ssize_t delete_device_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + int id;
> + char end;
> + int res;
> + struct mikrobus_port *port = to_mikrobus_port(dev);
> +
> + res = sscanf(buf, "%d%c", &id, &end);
> + if (res < 1) {
> + pr_err("delete_board: Can't parse board ID\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (port->board == NULL) {
Normally in kernel code this form is used:
if (!port->board) {
> + pr_err("delete_board: port does not have any boards registered\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + mikrobus_unregister_board(port, port->board);
> + return count;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(delete_device, 0200, NULL, delete_device_store);
> +
> +static struct attribute *mikrobus_port_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_new_device.attr, &dev_attr_rescan.attr,
> + &dev_attr_delete_device.attr, &dev_attr_name.attr, NULL};
> +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(mikrobus_port);
> +
> +static void mikrobus_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct mikrobus_port *port = to_mikrobus_port(dev);
> +
> + idr_remove(&mikrobus_port_idr, port->id);
> + kfree(port);
> +}
> +
> +struct device_type mikrobus_port_type = {
> + .groups = mikrobus_port_groups,
> + .release = mikrobus_dev_release,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mikrobus_port_type);
> +
> +static int mikrobus_get_irq(struct mikrobus_port *port, int irqno,
> + int irq_type)
> +{
> + int irq;
> +
> + switch (irqno) {
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_INT:
> + irq = gpiod_to_irq(port->int_gpio);
> + break;
Please fix your indentation here. (And everywhere; I give
an example of the proper way to do it below.)
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_RST:
> + irq = gpiod_to_irq(port->rst_gpio);
> + break;
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_PWM:
> + irq = gpiod_to_irq(port->pwm_gpio);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + pr_err("Could not get irq for irq type: %d", irqno);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + irq_set_irq_type(irq, irq_type);
It shouldn't return an error, but please check the
return value here.
> + return irq;
> +}
> +
> +static int mikrobus_setup_gpio(struct gpio_desc *gpio, int gpio_state)
> +{
> + int retval;
> +
> + if (gpio_state == MIKROBUS_GPIO_UNUSED)
> + return 0;
> + switch (gpio_state) {
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_INPUT:
> + retval = gpiod_direction_input(gpio);
> + break;
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_OUTPUT_HIGH:
> + retval = gpiod_direction_output(gpio, 1);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio, 1);
> + break;
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_OUTPUT_LOW:
> + retval = gpiod_direction_output(gpio, 0);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio, 0);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> +static void mikrobus_spi_device_delete(struct spi_master *master, unsigned int cs)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> + char str[32];
> +
> + snprintf(str, sizeof(str), "%s.%u", dev_name(&master->dev), cs);
> + dev = bus_find_device_by_name(&spi_bus_type, NULL, str);
> + if (dev != NULL) {
> + spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev));
> + put_device(dev);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static char *mikrobus_get_gpio_chip_name(struct mikrobus_port *port, int gpio)
> +{
> + char *name;
> + struct gpio_chip *gpiochip;
> +
> + switch (gpio) {
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_INT:
> + gpiochip = gpiod_to_chip(port->int_gpio);
> + name = kmemdup(gpiochip->label, 40, GFP_KERNEL);
Why 40? Please use a symbolic constant so you can
change it easily, and to give you a place to explain
why 40 is the limit used.
> + break;
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_RST:
> + gpiochip = gpiod_to_chip(port->rst_gpio);
> + name = kmemdup(gpiochip->label, 40, GFP_KERNEL);
> + break;
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_PWM:
> + gpiochip = gpiod_to_chip(port->pwm_gpio);
> + name = kmemdup(gpiochip->label, 40, GFP_KERNEL);
> + break;
> + }
> + return name;
> +}
> +
> +static int mikrobus_get_gpio_hwnum(struct mikrobus_port *port, int gpio)
> +{
> + int hwnum;
> + struct gpio_chip *gpiochip;
> +
> + switch (gpio) {
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_INT:
> + gpiochip = gpiod_to_chip(port->int_gpio);
> + hwnum = desc_to_gpio(port->int_gpio) - gpiochip->base;
> + break;
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_RST:
> + gpiochip = gpiod_to_chip(port->rst_gpio);
> + hwnum = desc_to_gpio(port->rst_gpio) - gpiochip->base;
> + break;
> + case MIKROBUS_GPIO_PWM:
> + gpiochip = gpiod_to_chip(port->pwm_gpio);
> + hwnum = desc_to_gpio(port->pwm_gpio) - gpiochip->base;
> + break;
> + }
> + return hwnum;
> +}
> +
> +static void release_mikrobus_device(struct board_device_info *dev)
We tend to follow a convention throughout the Greybus code
that has the object name as the prefix for things you do
to the object. I don't know how consistent that is, but
my suggestion would be that these functions would be named
something more like:
mikrobus_gpio_chip_name_get()
mikrobus_gpio_hwnum_get()
mikrobus_board_release_device_all()
mikrobus_device_register()
mikrobus_device_unregister()
mikrobus_board_register()
mikrobus_board_unregister()
and so on.
> +{
> + list_del(&dev->links);
> + kfree(dev);
> +}
> +
(I skipped reviewing a lot here...)
. . .
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.h b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9684d315f564
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_core
. . .
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.c b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..60ebca560f0d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,390 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * mikroBUS manifest parsing, an
> + * extension to Greybus Manifest Parsing
> + * under drivers/greybus/manifest.c
> + *
> + * Copyright 2014-2015 Google Inc.
> + * Copyright 2014-2015 Linaro Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "mikrobus_manifest: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> +#include <linux/greybus/greybus_manifest.h>
> +
> +#include "mikrobus_manifest.h"
> +
> +struct manifest_desc {
> + struct list_head links;
> + size_t size;
> + void *data;
> + enum greybus_descriptor_type type;
> +};
> +
> +static void release_manifest_descriptor(struct manifest_desc *descriptor)
> +{
> + list_del(&descriptor->links);
> + kfree(descriptor);
> +}
> +
> +static void release_manifest_descriptors(struct addon_board_info *info)
> +{
> + struct manifest_desc *descriptor;
> + struct manifest_desc *next;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(descriptor, next, &info->manifest_descs, links)
> + release_manifest_descriptor(descriptor);
> +}
> +
> +static int identify_descriptor(struct addon_board_info *info, struct greybus_descriptor *desc,
> + size_t size)
> +{
I know it's technically acceptable now, but please limit your lines to
80 characters in the Greybus code if possible.
> + struct greybus_descriptor_header *desc_header = &desc->header;
> + struct manifest_desc *descriptor;
> + size_t desc_size;
> + size_t expected_size;
> +
> + if (size < sizeof(*desc_header))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + desc_size = le16_to_cpu(desc_header->size);
> + if (desc_size > size)
> + return -EINVAL;
Probably check if (desc_size != size) here.
> + expected_size = sizeof(*desc_header);
> + switch (desc_header->type) {
> + case GREYBUS_TYPE_STRING:
> + expected_size += sizeof(struct greybus_descriptor_string);
> + expected_size += desc->string.length;
> + expected_size = ALIGN(expected_size, 4);
> + break;
Your indentation is wrong here. Please use:
switch (desc_header->type) {
case GREYBUS_TYPE_STRING:
expected_size += ...;
...
break;
case GREYBUS_TYPE_PROPERTY:
...
> + case GREYBUS_TYPE_PROPERTY:
> + expected_size += sizeof(struct greybus_descriptor_property);
> + expected_size += desc->property.length;
> + expected_size = ALIGN(expected_size, 4);
> + break;
> + case GREYBUS_TYPE_DEVICE:
> + expected_size += sizeof(struct greybus_descriptor_device);
> + break;
> + case GREYBUS_TYPE_MIKROBUS:
> + expected_size += sizeof(struct greybus_descriptor_mikrobus);
> + break;
> + case GREYBUS_TYPE_INTERFACE:
> + expected_size += sizeof(struct greybus_descriptor_interface);
> + break;
> + case GREYBUS_TYPE_CPORT:
> + expected_size += sizeof(struct greybus_descriptor_cport);
> + break;
> + case GREYBUS_TYPE_BUNDLE:
> + expected_size += sizeof(struct greybus_descriptor_bundle);
> + break;
> + case GREYBUS_TYPE_INVALID:
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + descriptor = kzalloc(sizeof(*descriptor), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!descriptor)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + descriptor->size = desc_size;
> + descriptor->data = (char *)desc + sizeof(*desc_header);
> + descriptor->type = desc_header->type;
> + list_add_tail(&descriptor->links, &info->manifest_descs);
> + return desc_size;
> +}
. . .
> +static int mikrobus_manifest_attach_device(struct addon_board_info *info,
> + struct greybus_descriptor_device *dev_desc)
> +{
> + struct board_device_info *dev;
I would suggest something other than "dev" as the name of
a board_device. The use of "dev" for (struct device *)
is pretty prevalent in the kernel, and so using it here
can be more confusing than it has to be.
> + struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup;
> + struct greybus_descriptor_property *desc_property;
> + struct manifest_desc *descriptor;
> + int i;
> + u8 *prop_link;
> + u8 *gpio_desc_link;
> +
> + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + dev->id = dev_desc->id;
> + dev->drv_name = mikrobus_string_get(info, dev_desc->driver_stringid);
This can return NULL. You need to check for that, and free
the board device you have already allocated.
> + dev->protocol = dev_desc->protocol;
> + dev->reg = dev_desc->reg;
> + dev->irq = dev_desc->irq;
> + dev->irq_type = dev_desc->irq_type;
> + dev->max_speed_hz = le32_to_cpu(dev_desc->max_speed_hz);
> + dev->mode = dev_desc->mode;
> + dev->cs_gpio = dev_desc->cs_gpio;
> + dev->num_gpio_resources = dev_desc->num_gpio_resources;
> + dev->num_properties = dev_desc->num_properties;
> + pr_info("device %d , number of properties=%d , number of gpio resources=%d\n",
> + dev->id, dev->num_properties, dev->num_gpio_resources);
> + if (dev->num_properties > 0) {
> + prop_link = mikrobus_property_link_get(info, dev_desc->prop_link,
> + MIKROBUS_PROPERTY_TYPE_LINK);
> + dev->properties = mikrobus_property_entry_get(info, prop_link, dev->num_properties);
> + }
> + if (dev->num_gpio_resources > 0) {
> + lookup = kzalloc(struct_size(lookup, table, dev->num_gpio_resources),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!lookup)
> + return -ENOMEM;
You can't return without freeing your previously-allocated resources.
> + gpio_desc_link = mikrobus_property_link_get(info, dev_desc->gpio_link,
> + MIKROBUS_PROPERTY_TYPE_GPIO);
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->num_gpio_resources; i++) {
> + list_for_each_entry(descriptor, &info->manifest_descs, links) {
> + if (descriptor->type != GREYBUS_TYPE_PROPERTY)
> + continue;
> + desc_property = descriptor->data;
> + if (desc_property->id == gpio_desc_link[i]) {
> + lookup->table[i].chip_hwnum = *desc_property->value;
> + lookup->table[i].con_id =
> + mikrobus_string_get(info, desc_property->propname_stringid);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + dev->gpio_lookup = lookup;
> + }
> + list_add_tail(&dev->links, &info->devices);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mikrobus_manifest_parse_devices(struct addon_board_info *info)
> +{
> + struct greybus_descriptor_device *desc_device;
> + struct manifest_desc *desc, *next;
> + int devcount = 0;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&info->devices)))
> + return false;
The manifest comes from outside the kernel I might be misunderstanding
something, but you should not be using WARN_ON() if its content doesn't
match what you expect.
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, next, &info->manifest_descs, links) {
> + if (desc->type != GREYBUS_TYPE_DEVICE)
> + continue;
> + desc_device = desc->data;
> + mikrobus_manifest_attach_device(info, desc_device);
You are ignoring the return value of mikrobus_manifest_attach_device().
> + devcount++;
> + }
> + return devcount;
> +}
> +
> +bool mikrobus_manifest_parse(struct addon_board_info *info, void *data,
> + size_t size)
You use "board" as the name of a "board_info" variable elsewhere.
That is much more helpful than "info". Please use a consistent
naming convention for your variables of given types if possible.
It makes it easier to follow the code.
> +{
> + struct greybus_manifest *manifest;
> + struct greybus_manifest_header *header;
> + struct greybus_descriptor *desc;
> + u16 manifest_size;
> + int dev_count;
> + int desc_size;
> +
Check the size before you bother checking anything else.
> + if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&info->manifest_descs)))
> + return false;
> + if (size < sizeof(*header))
> + return false;
> + manifest = data;
> + header = &manifest->header;
> + manifest_size = le16_to_cpu(header->size);
> + if (manifest_size != size)
> + return false;
It would be helpful to report what the problem with the
manifest is (here and in all cases). Otherwise it's a
little mysterious why adding a board fails.
> + if (header->version_major > MIKROBUS_VERSION_MAJOR)
> + return false;
Version checks!!! This is good! But the topic is of great
interest to Greybus people! Not sure we ever completely
resolved that. That's my only comment on this for now.
> + desc = manifest->descriptors;
> + size -= sizeof(*header);
Why aren't you using mikrobus_manifest_header_validate() here?
> + while (size) {
> + desc_size = identify_descriptor(info, desc, size);
What you're really doing with identify_descriptor() is adding
a valid descriptor to a board's list of descriptors. I think
the name of that function shoudl reflect that. If it isn't
identified, that's an error--but that's not the purpose of
that function. So maybe:
desc_ = board_descriptor_add(board, desc, size);
> + if (desc_size < 0) {
> + pr_err("invalid manifest descriptor");
> + return -EINVAL;
Your indentation of the return statement here is wrong.
> + }
> + desc = (struct greybus_descriptor *)((char *)desc + desc_size);
I don't know if this is better, but this could be:
desc = (void *)desc + desc_size;
> + size -= desc_size;
> + }
> + mikrobus_state_get(info);
> + dev_count = mikrobus_manifest_parse_devices(info);
> + pr_info(" %s manifest parsed with %d device(s)\n", info->name,
> + info->num_devices);
> + release_manifest_descriptors(info);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +size_t mikrobus_manifest_header_validate(void *data, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct greybus_manifest_header *header;
> + u16 manifest_size;
> +
> + if (size < sizeof(*header))
> + return 0;
> +
> + header = data;
> + manifest_size = le16_to_cpu(header->size);
> + if (header->version_major > MIKROBUS_VERSION_MAJOR)
> + return 0;
> + return manifest_size;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.h b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a195d1c26493
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mikrobus/mikrobus_manifest.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * mikroBUS manifest definition
> + * extension to Greybus Manifest Definition
> + *
> + * Copyright 2014-2015 Google Inc.
> + * Copyright 2014-2015 Linaro Ltd.
> + *
> + * Released under the GPLv2 and BSD licenses.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __MIKROBUS_MANIFEST_H
> +#define __MIKROBUS_MANIFEST_H
> +
> +#include "mikrobus_core.h"
> +
> +bool mikrobus_manifest_parse(struct addon_board_info *info, void *data,
> + size_t size);
> +size_t mikrobus_manifest_header_validate(void *data, size_t size);
> +
> +#endif /* __MIKROBUS_MANIFEST_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/greybus/greybus_manifest.h b/include/linux/greybus/greybus_manifest.h
> index 6e62fe478712..79c8cab9ef96 100644
> --- a/include/linux/greybus/greybus_manifest.h
> +++ b/include/linux/greybus/greybus_manifest.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ enum greybus_descriptor_type {
> GREYBUS_TYPE_STRING = 0x02,
> GREYBUS_TYPE_BUNDLE = 0x03,
> GREYBUS_TYPE_CPORT = 0x04,
> + GREYBUS_TYPE_MIKROBUS = 0x05,
> + GREYBUS_TYPE_PROPERTY = 0x06,
> + GREYBUS_TYPE_DEVICE = 0x07,
Please align your new values with the rest, for consistency.
> };
>
> enum greybus_protocol {
> @@ -151,6 +154,53 @@ struct greybus_descriptor_cport {
> __u8 protocol_id; /* enum greybus_protocol */
> } __packed;
>
> +/*
> + * A mikrobus descriptor is used to describe the details
> + * about the add-on board connected to the mikrobus port.
> + * It describes the number of indivdual devices on the
> + * add-on board and the default states of the GPIOs
> + */
> +struct greybus_descriptor_mikrobus {
> + __u8 num_devices;
> + __u8 rst_gpio_state;
> + __u8 pwm_gpio_state;
> + __u8 int_gpio_state;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/*
> + * A property descriptor is used to pass named properties
> + * to device drivers through the unified device properties
> + * interface under linux/property.h
> + */
> +struct greybus_descriptor_property {
> + __u8 length;
> + __u8 id;
> + __u8 propname_stringid;
> + __u8 type;
> + __u8 value[0];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/*
> + * A device descriptor is used to describe the
> + * details required by a add-on board device
> + * driver.
> + */
> +struct greybus_descriptor_device {
> + __u8 id;
> + __u8 driver_stringid;
> + __u8 num_properties;
> + __u8 protocol;
> + __le32 max_speed_hz;
> + __u8 reg;
> + __u8 mode;
> + __u8 num_gpio_resources;
> + __u8 cs_gpio;
> + __u8 irq;
> + __u8 irq_type;
> + __u8 prop_link;
> + __u8 gpio_link;
> +} __packed;
> +
> struct greybus_descriptor_header {
> __le16 size;
> __u8 type; /* enum greybus_descriptor_type */
> @@ -164,6 +214,9 @@ struct greybus_descriptor {
> struct greybus_descriptor_interface interface;
> struct greybus_descriptor_bundle bundle;
> struct greybus_descriptor_cport cport;
> + struct greybus_descriptor_mikrobus mikrobus;
> + struct greybus_descriptor_property property;
> + struct greybus_descriptor_device device;
We're going to need to talk about these things... But I can't
comment much more without learning more about the broader
architecture.
-Alex
> };
> } __packed;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists