[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200726160616.GA2662@kozik-lap>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:06:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Limit MTD_NAND_JZ4780 to
architecture only
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 08:30:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 2:17 PM Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net> wrote:
> > Le ven. 24 juil. 2020 à 17:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> a
> > écrit :
> > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 05:50:06PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > >> Le ven. 24 juil. 2020 à 17:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > >> <krzk@...nel.org> a écrit:
> > >> > On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 17:19, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On MIPS, the SoC selection is a Kconfig "choice", so you can only
> > >> support
> > >> one SoC family, unfortunately.
> > >
> > > Let's say someone selected then some other architecture
> > > (MIPS_ALCHEMY).
> > > They could select this MTD driver.
> > >
> > > Does it mean they would be able to run it on Ingenic hardware?
> >
> > In *theory* yes, as long as the Kconfig options that MACH_INGENIC
> > selects are enabled, the kernel should boot and work on Ingenic SoCs.
>
> Right now, this won't work yet, because there are platform specific
> functions that are implemented by each of the platforms in arch/mips,
> e.g. arch/mips/generic/init.c and arch/mips/jz4740/setup.c.
I would say even more - no DTS would be provided for such configuration.
All Ingenic DTSes are included only with MACH_INGENIC. You cannot build
a kernel working on Ingenic without MACH_INGENIC. Even in theory.
>
> A lot of the newer platforms are part of arch/mips/generic
> (CONFIG_MIPS_GENERIC), which roughly corresponds to
> CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM on in arch/arm/.
> Similarly, there are header files in arch/mips/include/asm/mach-*/
> that conflict and you need to have the right one.
>
> To have more than one platform enabled, each one needs to
> have all of that platform code converted to fit into the
> MIPS_GENERIC framework. This can be a lot of work, but
> I suppose the ingenic platform would be a candidate for
> which this makes sense, as long as new SoCs of that family
> still come out.
I can therefore change the patch to:
depends on MACH_INGENIC || MIPS_GENERIC || COMPILE_TEST
Other solution is to leave MTD driver as is and for the memory driver go
with my v2 approach:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200724074038.5597-6-krzk@kernel.org/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists