linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] proc,fcntl: introduce F_SET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGbU3_my8uz0XU5kJ7k20Ex-+nGwSw+0+oXJ3zyGHDw+8ft4wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:42:53 -0700
From:   Pascal Bouchareine <kalou@....net>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc,fcntl: introduce F_SET_DESCRIPTION

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 3:10 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Have you even tried to test it?  When will it ever free those things?

Thanks for pointing that out, I'll try to address that in the thread

I did basic tests against 5.4: set a description, concurrently set it
from multiple child processes, read, demo with ss/netstat.

However I rebased against master and have not tested the build after
rebase, is that broken?
Should I use a different target for tests?

Thanks for your help