linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 36/86] ipvs: fix the connection sync failed in some cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200727134916.247315499@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:04:10 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, zhouxudong <zhouxudong8@...wei.com>,
        guodeqing <geffrey.guo@...wei.com>, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 36/86] ipvs: fix the connection sync failed in some cases

From: guodeqing <geffrey.guo@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 8210e344ccb798c672ab237b1a4f241bda08909b ]

The sync_thread_backup only checks sk_receive_queue is empty or not,
there is a situation which cannot sync the connection entries when
sk_receive_queue is empty and sk_rmem_alloc is larger than sk_rcvbuf,
the sync packets are dropped in __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb, this is
because the packets in reader_queue is not read, so the rmem is
not reclaimed.

Here I add the check of whether the reader_queue of the udp sock is
empty or not to solve this problem.

Fixes: 2276f58ac589 ("udp: use a separate rx queue for packet reception")
Reported-by: zhouxudong <zhouxudong8@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: guodeqing <geffrey.guo@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
index 5acd99f83166b..f6af13c16cf57 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
@@ -1717,6 +1717,8 @@ static int sync_thread_backup(void *data)
 {
 	struct ip_vs_sync_thread_data *tinfo = data;
 	struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = tinfo->ipvs;
+	struct sock *sk = tinfo->sock->sk;
+	struct udp_sock *up = udp_sk(sk);
 	int len;
 
 	pr_info("sync thread started: state = BACKUP, mcast_ifn = %s, "
@@ -1724,12 +1726,14 @@ static int sync_thread_backup(void *data)
 		ipvs->bcfg.mcast_ifn, ipvs->bcfg.syncid, tinfo->id);
 
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
-		wait_event_interruptible(*sk_sleep(tinfo->sock->sk),
-			 !skb_queue_empty(&tinfo->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue)
-			 || kthread_should_stop());
+		wait_event_interruptible(*sk_sleep(sk),
+					 !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) ||
+					 !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&up->reader_queue) ||
+					 kthread_should_stop());
 
 		/* do we have data now? */
-		while (!skb_queue_empty(&(tinfo->sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))) {
+		while (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue) ||
+		       !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&up->reader_queue)) {
 			len = ip_vs_receive(tinfo->sock, tinfo->buf,
 					ipvs->bcfg.sync_maxlen);
 			if (len <= 0) {
-- 
2.25.1