[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F6B0D4A@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:27:18 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Park, Kyung Min" <kyung.min.park@...el.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] x86/cpu: Use SERIALIZE in sync_core() when available
> For a really overenginered solution, but which might perform unnecessary poorly on existing hardware:
>
> asm volatile("1: .byte 0xf, 0x1, 0xe8; 2:"
> _ASM_EXTABLE(1b,2b));
You win the prize for the smallest code. Might need (the already large) comment to double
in size to explain the subtleties!
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists