[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D235EQ.3HLG82ZFRC5C3@crapouillou.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 19:54:13 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
od@...c.me, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/bridge: Add SPI DBI host driver
Hi Laurent,
Le lun. 27 juil. 2020 à 20:06, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> a écrit :
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 06:46:10PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> This driver will register a DBI host driver for panels connected
>> over
>> SPI.
>>
>> DBI types c1 and c3 are supported. C1 is a SPI protocol with 9 bits
>> per
>> word, with the data/command information in the 9th (MSB) bit. C3 is
>> a
>> SPI protocol with 8 bits per word, with the data/command information
>> carried by a separate GPIO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 8 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dbi-spi.c | 261
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 270 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dbi-spi.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
>> index c7f0dacfb57a..ed38366847c1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
>> @@ -219,6 +219,14 @@ config DRM_TI_TPD12S015
>> Texas Instruments TPD12S015 HDMI level shifter and ESD
>> protection
>> driver.
>>
>> +config DRM_MIPI_DBI_SPI
>> + tristate "SPI host support for MIPI DBI"
>> + depends on OF && SPI
>> + select DRM_MIPI_DSI
>> + select DRM_MIPI_DBI
>> + help
>> + Driver to support DBI over SPI.
>> +
>> source "drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/Kconfig"
>>
>> source "drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/Kconfig"
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
>> index 7d7c123a95e4..c2c522c2774f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511) += adv7511/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_TI_SN65DSI86) += ti-sn65dsi86.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_TI_TFP410) += ti-tfp410.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_TI_TPD12S015) += ti-tpd12s015.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_MIPI_DBI_SPI) += dbi-spi.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_NWL_MIPI_DSI) += nwl-dsi.o
>>
>> obj-y += analogix/
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dbi-spi.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dbi-spi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..1060b8f95fba
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dbi-spi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +/*
>> + * MIPI Display Bus Interface (DBI) SPI support
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2016 Noralf Trønnes
>> + * Copyright 2020 Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_mipi_dbi.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
>> +
>> +#include <video/mipi_display.h>
>> +
>> +struct dbi_spi {
>> + struct mipi_dsi_host host;
>> + struct mipi_dsi_host_ops host_ops;
>> +
>> + struct spi_device *spi;
>> + struct gpio_desc *dc;
>> + struct mutex cmdlock;
>> +
>> + unsigned int current_bus_type;
>> +
>> + /**
>> + * @tx_buf9: Buffer used for Option 1 9-bit conversion
>> + */
>> + void *tx_buf9;
>> +
>> + /**
>> + * @tx_buf9_len: Size of tx_buf9.
>> + */
>> + size_t tx_buf9_len;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline struct dbi_spi *host_to_dbi_spi(struct mipi_dsi_host
>> *host)
>> +{
>> + return container_of(host, struct dbi_spi, host);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t dbi_spi1_transfer(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>> + const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + struct dbi_spi *dbi = host_to_dbi_spi(host);
>> + struct spi_device *spi = dbi->spi;
>> + struct spi_transfer tr = {
>> + .bits_per_word = 9,
>> + };
>> + const u8 *src8 = msg->tx_buf;
>> + struct spi_message m;
>> + size_t max_chunk, chunk;
>> + size_t len = msg->tx_len;
>> + bool cmd_byte = true;
>> + unsigned int i;
>> + u16 *dst16;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + tr.speed_hz = mipi_dbi_spi_cmd_max_speed(spi, len);
>> + dst16 = dbi->tx_buf9;
>> +
>> + max_chunk = min(dbi->tx_buf9_len / 2, len);
>> +
>> + spi_message_init_with_transfers(&m, &tr, 1);
>> + tr.tx_buf = dst16;
>> +
>> + while (len) {
>> + chunk = min(len, max_chunk);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < chunk; i++) {
>> + dst16[i] = *src8++;
>> +
>> + /* Bit 9: 0 means command, 1 means data */
>> + if (!cmd_byte)
>> + dst16[i] |= BIT(9);
>> +
>> + cmd_byte = false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + tr.len = chunk * 2;
>> + len -= chunk;
>> +
>> + ret = spi_sync(spi, &m);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t dbi_spi3_transfer(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>> + const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + struct dbi_spi *dbi = host_to_dbi_spi(host);
>> + struct spi_device *spi = dbi->spi;
>> + const u8 *buf = msg->tx_buf;
>> + unsigned int bpw = 8;
>> + u32 speed_hz;
>> + ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> + /* for now we only support sending messages, not receiving */
>> + if (msg->rx_len)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dbi->dc, 0);
>> +
>> + speed_hz = mipi_dbi_spi_cmd_max_speed(spi, 1);
>> + ret = mipi_dbi_spi_transfer(spi, speed_hz, 8, buf, 1);
>> + if (ret || msg->tx_len == 1)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (buf[0] == MIPI_DCS_WRITE_MEMORY_START)
>> + bpw = 16;
>> +
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(dbi->dc, 1);
>> + speed_hz = mipi_dbi_spi_cmd_max_speed(spi, msg->tx_len - 1);
>> +
>> + ret = mipi_dbi_spi_transfer(spi, speed_hz, bpw,
>> + &buf[1], msg->tx_len - 1);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return msg->tx_len;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t dbi_spi_transfer(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>> + const struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + struct dbi_spi *dbi = host_to_dbi_spi(host);
>> +
>> + switch (dbi->current_bus_type) {
>> + case MIPI_DEVICE_TYPE_DBI_SPI_MODE1:
>> + return dbi_spi1_transfer(host, msg);
>> + case MIPI_DEVICE_TYPE_DBI_SPI_MODE3:
>> + return dbi_spi3_transfer(host, msg);
>> + default:
>> + dev_err(&dbi->spi->dev, "Unknown transfer type\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dbi_spi_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>> +{
>> + struct dbi_spi *dbi = host_to_dbi_spi(host);
>> +
>> + dbi->current_bus_type = dsi->bus_type;
>> +
>> + if (dbi->current_bus_type == MIPI_DEVICE_TYPE_DBI_SPI_MODE1) {
>> + dbi->tx_buf9_len = SZ_16K;
>> +
>> + dbi->tx_buf9 = kmalloc(dbi->tx_buf9_len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!dbi->tx_buf9)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dbi_spi_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>> +{
>> + struct dbi_spi *dbi = host_to_dbi_spi(host);
>> +
>> + kfree(dbi->tx_buf9);
>> + dbi->tx_buf9_len = 0;
>> +
>> + return 0; /* Nothing to do */
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dbi_spi_host_unregister(void *d)
>> +{
>> + mipi_dsi_host_unregister(d);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dbi_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &spi->dev;
>> + struct mipi_dsi_device_info info = { };
>> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
>> + struct dbi_spi *dbi;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + dbi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dbi), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!dbi)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + dbi->host.dev = dev;
>> + dbi->host.ops = &dbi->host_ops;
>> + dbi->spi = spi;
>> + spi_set_drvdata(spi, dbi);
>> +
>> + dbi->dc = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "dc", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>> + if (IS_ERR(dbi->dc)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get gpio 'dc'\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(dbi->dc);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (spi_is_bpw_supported(spi, 9))
>> + dbi->host.bus_types |= MIPI_DEVICE_TYPE_DBI_SPI_MODE1;
>> + if (dbi->dc)
>> + dbi->host.bus_types |= MIPI_DEVICE_TYPE_DBI_SPI_MODE3;
>> +
>> + if (!dbi->host.bus_types) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Neither Type1 nor Type3 are supported\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dbi->host_ops.transfer = dbi_spi_transfer;
>> + dbi->host_ops.attach = dbi_spi_attach;
>> + dbi->host_ops.detach = dbi_spi_detach;
>> +
>> + mutex_init(&dbi->cmdlock);
>> +
>> + ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dbi->host);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to register DSI host\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, dbi_spi_host_unregister,
>> &dbi->host);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Register our own node as a MIPI DSI device.
>> + * This ensures that the panel driver will be probed.
>> + */
>> + info.channel = 0;
>> + info.node = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
>> +
>> + dsi = mipi_dsi_device_register_full(&dbi->host, &info);
>
> Two devices for the same OF node is asking for trouble :-S
There is nothing that prevents you from doing that, and it's been done
before (on Ingenic SoCs we have one DT node shared by 3 drivers).
> Looking at the other patches in this series, it seems that what you
> need
> from the DSI framework is DCS. I think we should then extract the DCS
> support to mipi_dcs_* functions, with two different backends, one for
> DSI and one for DBI. That way you will be able to support DBI panels
> with a single driver instead of splutting the support between two
> drivers (this one and the corresponding mipi_dsi_driver's).
Then that would be five different backends, one for DSI, one for
DBI/i8080, one for DBI/m68k, one for DBI/spi9, one for DBI/spi+gpio.
Without the SPI/DBI bridge, your panel driver then has to support
probing from two different buses, as a mipi_dsi_driver, and as a
mipi_spi_driver, if you want to support both interfaces. That moves a
lot of the complexity to the panel driver itself. Besides, to transform
the spi_device to a mipi_dsi_device that the driver manipulates,
wouldn't the shared code need to register a new DSI device with a
SPI-to-DBI host anyway? The only difference is that it wouldn't be done
in a separate driver.
So I fail to see how that would work better. A shared node may look
scary but I think it's the cleanest solution.
As for backends: Having mipi_dcs_* functions with different backends
wouldn't really work either, because that assumes that DSI and DBI are
completely different buses. But one controller can very well support
both DSI and DBI/i8080, and as such one "DCS host driver" should be
able to support both. So the distinction should be made within the host
drivers, which should present a unified DCS API. This is basically what
this patchset does but with the current DSI API as the "unified DCS
API".
-Paul
>
>> + if (IS_ERR(dsi)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add DSI device\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(dsi);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id dbi_spi_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "adafruit,yx240qv29" },
>> + { .compatible = "leadtek,ltk035c5444t-spi" },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dbi_spi_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct spi_driver dbi_spi_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "dbi-spi",
>> + .of_match_table = dbi_spi_of_match,
>> + },
>> + .probe = dbi_spi_probe,
>> +};
>> +module_spi_driver(dbi_spi_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DBI SPI bus driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists