[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2007280405340.18670@namei.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 04:05:54 +1000 (AEST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] integrity: remove redundant initialization of variable
ret
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The variable ret is being initialized with a value that is never read
> and it is being updated later with a new value. The initialization is
> redundant and can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c b/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c
> index 4e0d6778277e..cfa4127d0518 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int asymmetric_verify(struct key *keyring, const char *sig,
> struct public_key_signature pks;
> struct signature_v2_hdr *hdr = (struct signature_v2_hdr *)sig;
> struct key *key;
> - int ret = -ENOMEM;
> + int ret;
Assuming Mimi will grab this.
Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists